User talk:Aviraj.gupta3

April 2018

If you are connected to someone or something you have written about (a few examples are writing about yourself, your business, your band, a member of your family, your client) then you should be aware that Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline discourages you from writing about that subject. The main reason for that is that experience over the years indicates that editors with such a connection to a subject they are writing about are likely to find it very difficult, or even impossible, to stand back from their writing and see how it will look from the detached perspective of an outsider, so that they are likely to write in ways that look promotional to others, even if they sincerely think they are writing in a neutral way. Also, if your editing forms all or part of work for which you are paid, whether as an employee, as a contractor, or in any other capacity, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require you to state who is paying you, and what your connection to them is. Furthermore, editing for any kind of promotion is not permitted by Wikipedia policy. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:58, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@"JamesBWatson" This page is just providing the information of the business. There is no intention of writing this article for the promotional purpose of the company. I have analysed it, and want your recommendations and advice about the article. Although if you think it is against the wiki policies and is a promotional page please suggest me few changes to be made so that I can publish the article.@--Aviraj.gupta3 (talk) 14:41, 18 April 2018 (UTC)aviraj.gupta3[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Epic Research Limited (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:CORPDEPTH. I did a search and this might be notable. Creator needs to progide more quality sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Epic Research Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Epic Research Limited, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 15:21, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Epic Research Limited has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Epic Research Limited. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:09, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]