User talk:AwbwMtl

Welcome!

Hi AwbwMtl! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 21:41, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: University corporate engagement (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Urban Versis 32 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article is based almost entirely on weasel and buzzwords ("develop mutually beneficial relationships that can result in various forms of engagement, such as research collaborations, technology transfer, student internships and placements, joint projects, and other forms of knowledge exchange"); see Wikipedia:Use plain English for more information on that. Also, review Timtrent's comments, as some of those issues do not seem to be resolved.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:University corporate engagement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 20:53, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AwbwMtl! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 20:53, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:University corporate engagement has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:University corporate engagement. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. I will work to improve the submission. AwbwMtl (talk) 13:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the comment about weasel and buzzwords. I am not trying to use weasel and buzzwords --these are the terms used in this work. I am trying to mirror Research development, and clearly missing the mark. I will start from scratch. AwbwMtl (talk) 13:58, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, AwbwMtl, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Mza highered (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Spicy (talk) 11:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not mza highered. That's my colleague who started the content in her sandbox(? I think that's the right terminology) but then I did a lot of the editing.

Is that alright? 71.250.211.160 (talk) 01:55, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, it looks like you're commenting while logged out. You should remember to log in to your account while editing to prevent confusion and avoid disclosing your IP address publicly. What is your relationship with Mza highered? You say they are your colleague - does that mean you are editing on behalf of a group or organization? Spicy (talk) 20:18, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mza highered and i are collaborating on creating University Corporate Engagement page. We are new to Wikipedia and appreciate the guidance that you are providing. We are professional friends interested in this topic. She works for a different organization that I do. We are both members of a professional organization. We are trying to mimic Research development wikipedia page. University Corporate Engagement is related but distinct from Research development. I will edit to parallel that page, more. I think we have a lot of references that support the premise of corporate engagement at a university. But the comment about the tone of what we have written is a good one. AwbwMtl (talk) 13:49, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. You might want to explain your relationship to each other on your user pages to avoid confusion. Wikipedia's guidelines on editing with a conflict of interest may also be relevant. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 20:52, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]