User talk:BIT2012
Welcome!
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg/300px-Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/Face-smile.svg/25px-Face-smile.svg.png)
Welcome to Wikipedia, BIT2012! Thank you for your contributions. I am Naraht and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Naraht (talk) 18:54, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Just to let you know, nothing that you've done is *lost*, previous versions are always accessible. Though I agree with the other editor, there certainly are statements that have been added which aren't appropriate in a Neutral Point of View encyclopedia or aren't Encyclopedic like "Just like most institutions founded by churches in this era, Bethel was understood as an invaluable asset for the growth and development of the church at large." and "It is a place for individual or group study, for social interaction, for quiet reflection, and is often a retreat from the bustle of the dorms or the busy office." However, I *very* much agree with you that there are facts which can be properly referenced which *should* be added to the article...Naraht (talk) 19:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Potential COI
[edit] Hello, BIT2012. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Bethel University (Tennessee), you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violations...
[edit]The text placed in the Wikipedia article can not be an exact copy of the text on the Bethel University website, it needs to be rewritten in your own words. Please see WP:COPYVIO.Naraht (talk) 18:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Echoing what Naraht said, I noticed the section about the current president is identical to what is on the university's wesbite. On Wikipedia, we are not allowed to directly copy text from websites as this may possibly violate copyright regulations. Can you please reword this section and then re-add it? LlamaDude78 (talk) 18:51, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Can you please change the "current president" section some more so that it is in your own words? Just shifting the order of the phrases does not resolve any potential copyright issues. Thanks, LlamaDude78 (talk) 20:00, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
August 2012
[edit] Your addition to Bethel University (Tennessee) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 20:08, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Latest edit at Bethel University (Tennessee)
[edit]Some improvements have been made but the recent additions to the Academics section don't appear to follow WP:NPOV. A Wikipedia article is not meant to advocate for a person or company but provide background and history in a neutral manner. For instance, "The faculty at Bethel is committed to teaching excellence in a liberal arts education" sounds promotional as well as a lot of other sentences around it. Also, to clarify, inline citations are supposed to be added the same time when information is added, not later. LlamaDude78 (talk) 18:44, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
- If you could get a citation from the Chronicle of Higher Education Almanac or another third party reliable source, then it would be fine to re-add "According to the 2011 Chronicle of Higher Education Almanac, Bethel University was ranked third in the United States of private, non-profit universities by growing its master’s programs by 128% in five years". If done like that, it won't be violating NPOV.LlamaDude78 (talk) 19:56, 31 August 2012 (UTC)