User talk:Baby Harley

Image source problem with Image:407th Brigade Support Battalion Distinctive Unit Insignia.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:407th Brigade Support Battalion Distinctive Unit Insignia.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:57, 13 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:57, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:407th Brigade Support Battalion Distinctive Unit Insignia.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:407th Brigade Support Battalion Distinctive Unit Insignia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:39, 21 August 2008 (UTC) --J Milburn (talk) 19:39, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hope Mills Lake

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hope Mills Lake, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.4tlg.com/friends_of_hope_mills_lake/history.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:11, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was just looking at this article, and it needs to be reworked because you took the entire text of the website to put into this entry. That exact text is owned by the Friends of Hope Mills Lake, and they would have to license the text for use in Wikipedia for it to appear word-for-word.

This is interesting information, but with only the Friends site as a source I don't think it necessarily needs to be a separate article right now. What I suggest is that you reword this information and add it to the Town of Hope Mills article, where it would expand a fairly short entry. Please let me know if you would like help sorting all this out; copyright issues on Wikipedia can be very complicated.--~T P W 03:24, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:42, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lawless Motorcycle Club

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lawless Motorcycle Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Benboy00 (talk) 00:12, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lawless Motorcycle Club Patch.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lawless Motorcycle Club Patch.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]