User talk:Bamadude
 Archives |
|---|
Messages for me
[edit]Please click the "+" sign above to start a new Talk topic with me or edit the appropriate section directly --- thanks!--Bamadude 22:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
No deal
[edit]Even if I wanted to (and I don't), I don't believe Cheeser1 or SarcasticIdealist are just going to let the issue drop. As for your last condition, that's a total nonstarter. While I have been less civil than I should have been, I stand by my edits as being in good faith and well within Wikipedia guidelines. However, I am satisfied with the state of article at this time. Clarityfiend 04:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Typical --- I'll pass this along.--Bamadude 04:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
ANI
[edit]Notice that your recent behavior is now up for discussion at ANI link here. R. Baley 09:06, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hoteltheband.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Hoteltheband.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Funny EH edit summary
[edit]This edit summary and this is sooooo funny! Thx for the laugh! 70.108.122.10 (talk) 17:37, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Joe Schermie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
not notable outside of Three Dog Night, and the entire article is undersourced
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)