User talk:Barbarina1

Fritz Zwicky

“A lot of people don’t know my father was a lot of fun,” she says. “We laughed all the time when we were together.” Sometimes he took her to work with him. “I recall that everyone at Caltech would scatter when Daddy and I would walk down the hallway of the astronomy building,” she says. “These people would scatter.” Out of fear? Respect? No, she says, out of shame, envy, awe. “Mediocrities felt very uncomfortable around him because they knew that they couldn’t meet that standard. It’s like in the light of God—man can’t stand in the light of God, almost. It’s not quite that,” she adds quickly. “Obviously he wasn’t a God figure.” She believes one of his greatest discoveries, though, is: Barbarina, a born-again Christian, says of dark matter, “I think it’s the Lord.”

The babbling by uninformed individuals seeking to aggrandize their importance has distorted this statement in the TALK. Mediocre colleagues fraught with professional jealousy and being exposed for their "bulges of trash in the scientific journals to hide their shortcomings" mounted a vicious campaign to malign my father after his passing. Defamation against a decedent allows for no legal defense so the cowards advancing the falsehoods, embellishments and anecdotes from mediocre colleagues and the oral history (hearsay), believed themselves secure in a safe harbor with no accountability. It is outrageous, to complain and distort the effort by any family member seeking to address blatant falsehoods against a decedent's memory within allowable guidelines.

Mediocre, envious colleagues routinely and cowardly could not stand beside him and were uncomfortable in his presence knowing that he exposed their shortcomings on a continuum. Intelligence vs. Imbecile was the comparative allusion in the sciences. Richard Panek, the author of the Discover article flows into my Christian belief without separation, which of course any antithetical individual will seek to distort. The clear statement was made: "Obviously he wasn’t a God figure.” Distortions to my statement are to be levied to the author seeking to distort and malign the narrative and not to me. Barbarina1 (talk) 20:41, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Barbarina1. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Fritz Zwicky, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Equine-man (talk) 19:56, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Unsourced

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Fritz Zwicky, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 21:49, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

The editor is claiming she is the daughter, therefore my COI warning above. Equine-man (talk) 22:59, 28 April 2023 (UTC)