User talk:Batmansexy

Hello, I'm Soulkeeper. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!

■■ Notification

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Shagrath page. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. XXN (talk) 15:28, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

■■■ Notification

Your recent editing history at Shagrath‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. XXN (talk) 16:40, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

■■■■ Notification

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Shagrath, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. //XXN (talk) 12:09, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Shagrath, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. XXN (talk) 09:29, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Dougweller (talk) 15:12, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Batmansexy. Thank you. XXN (talk) 17:56, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:29, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]