User talk:Bdelegate1234!

August 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Huon (talk) 19:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You explicitly agreed to stop trying to create an article about CMUNC and, once unblocked, immediately proceeded to create an article about CMUNC. Sorry, that won't do. Huon (talk) 19:04, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bdelegate1234! (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not affiliated with any organization and administrators will not allow me to create a page on CMUNC, which is a significant organziation. I do not understand why when the page does not seem promotional in any way. Plenty of similar organizations have pages and it is unfair to delete and block me as a user when I am not writing anything harmful or offensive. The page was quickly deleted before anyone could even read it. I would like to at least have an administrator read what I have written on the page that was deleted so that they can at least see my side of the argumentBdelegate1234! (talk) 19:29, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You appear to be unclear on the concept. Please find another venue to promote your organization. I've salted both article titles, so you don't have to worry about making further attempts. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I did read what you wrote. Could you please explain why you thought it appropriate to create that page after explicitly agreeing in your previous unblock request that you would not do so? Huon (talk) 19:34, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bdelegate1234! (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It was honestly because I didn't know what to do. I understand it was not the best decision, but it was my first time on wikipedia and I did not understand what part of my page seemed promotional. I did not advertise anything. I only wrote the about the organization in ways I saw was done on other wikipedia pages. There was no advertising material and now all I wrote has been deleted and I cannot retrieve it.Bdelegate1234! (talk) 9:53 pm, Today (UTC+2)

Decline reason:

It is obvious that your only purpose here is to promote CMUNC. We gave you a second chance, you blew it. Now, you keep telling the same story again. You don't even try to understand what was wrong with your edits. Because you are wasting our time, I revoked your talk page access. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:35, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There's no point in unblocking you since it's abundantly clear that you are only here for one purpose. Since the titles have been salted, it's a moot point anyway.OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:12, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Vanjagenije (talk) 20:36, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]