User talk:Beauzo2979

January 2024

Hello everyone I am Beauzo2979 (talk). If you have any articles that you want me to edit I would be happy to look at them if you send them to me. :)

Bio

This user is a participant in WikiProject Video games.

This user is a recent changes patroller.

Wikipedia Edit Score

I believe that Wikipedia should have an edit score, so when someone is thinking about promoting you up a rank they can make an informed decision. The way this score would work in theory is you would get about 2-3 points per small edit 4-5 points per medium edit and 6-7 points per large edit. These point numbers would be automatically determined by how much the file size of the article increases. If you make an nonconstructive edit or vandalism the admins can take a way a certain amount of points (somewhere in between 1-25). If a bot is what flagged the edit as nonconstructive or vandalism they would take away 15 points, and you would be given the option to explain what you were doing possibly either lowering the amount of points taken away or even nullifying it, but to discourage people from just contesting every single point taken away from them you could set up a strike system where after having 3-5 contested point losses where the point value wasn't lowered they would get temporarily banned if they hadn't already gotten banned for the repeated vandalism. You could also use this system instead of just having to wait to get certain auto confirmed statuses you could just set a point threshold that you have to reach before getting these roles. Beauzo2979 (talk) 19:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, under these guidelines I would have roughly an edit score of 190. Beauzo2979 (talk) 19:29, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Edit Patrolling

The exact filters that I use for Recent Edit patrolling is already on this link for anyone who would also Like to edit patrol. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges?damaging=likelybad%3Bverylikelybad&goodfaith=likelybad%3Bverylikelybad&userExpLevel=unregistered%3Bregistered%3Bnewcomer&hidebots=1&hidepreviousrevisions=1&hidecategorization=1&hideWikibase=1&hidenewuserlog=1&limit=50&days=0.04166&damaging__likelygood_color=c2&damaging__maybebad_color=c3&damaging__likelybad_color=c4&damaging__verylikelybad_color=c5&goodfaith__likelygood_color=c2&goodfaith__maybebad_color=c3&goodfaith__likelybad_color=c4&goodfaith__verylikelybad_color=c5&urlversion=2 Beauzo2979 (talk) 14:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm Fanfanboy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ordovician have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Fanfanboy (talk) 17:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Edit that I reverted was an nonconstructive edit. Beauzo2979 (talk) 17:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I think what happened was you tried to revert the non-constructive edit, but didn't see that it had already been reverted so you reverted the reversion Fanfanboy (talk) 17:08, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing good

The warning I gave you could be considered void as it was only because of a simple mistake. It seems most of what you do is Anti-Vandalism and you seem to be doing a decent job. However I would highly recommend using tools such as Twinkle and/or RedWarn to make reverting, and warning much easier. Fanfanboy (talk) 17:19, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just came here to make the same recommendation (WP:TWINKLE). You reverted content blanking on Khmer traditional clothing by an IP editor, however they made two edits in a row, both of which removed a large amount of content, so you only reverted one of those edits. If you used twinkle, your single-click revert would have removed both of their edits. I've restored the article to an earlier version.

Another benefit of twinkle is that you can configure it to automatically open the talk page for the user that you reverted and provides an easy-click menu to select a warning comment. Warning editors that you've reverted for improper editing is helpful for two reasons: (1) it informs the editor about what they're doing wrong so they can hopefully improves, and (2) it provides a history of warnings that can be used when necessary as grounds to block a vandal. Schazjmd (talk) 14:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Five Nights at Freddy's Timeline

Hello, Beauzo2979. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Five Nights at Freddy's Timeline, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Five Nights at Freddy's Timeline

Hello, Beauzo2979. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Five Nights at Freddy's Timeline".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 15:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]