User talk:Beingmai

Speedy deletion nomination of The Stamble

Hello, Beingmai

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Stamble for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Yeeno (talk) 🍁 03:12, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Beingmai, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorials
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Yeeno (talk) 🍁 03:13, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Trident (Company)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Trident (Company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Elli (talk | contribs) 07:16, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let's look at the references given for that article

https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-cm/trident-hits-the-roof-after-strong-production-update-121061000740_1.html: This has the Business Standard disclaimer: "This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)"
https://m.republicworld.com/technology-news/gaming/where-to-sell-trident-of-dark-tides-find-out-how-to-obtain-and-use-trident-of-dark-tides.html, https://m.republicworld.com/technology-news/gaming/best-trident-enchantments-in-minecraft-understand-the-abilities-of-these-enchantments.html: these are about the video game Minecraft, and have nothing at all to do with a textile manufacturing company in India
https://www.thehindu.com/entertainment/movies/ashwin-kumar-pugazh-to-star-in-rom-com-enna-solla-pogirai/article35053658.ece - this is about a film, and has nothing at all to do with a textile manufacturing company in India
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lockheed-lmt-wins-191m-deal-144302013.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAF5cbUKj735H5fisuLRIoddeTmlumsagTW1NfpEs07yhAD9JmRzYLXX93No0JpI1x8WzLeH5NnH0-wO9LYByxfCjb6CPTOQGuK0ebyG4IzLIy-ADHXa9FsnzL-vRuIX_1uHBePuDxiJRi1ex0uiY5iZftziJKB9ZKfyyKzo9e-Oy about the Trident (missile) and has nothing at all to do with a textile manufacturing company in India

There may be a notable company of this name. Perhaps you have simply started the article in ways that were incompatible with the way articles should be started and referenced. That's OK, we all make mistakes - but I do note that use of references about "Trident" unrelated to this company may not pass the assume good faith policy. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:13, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LS2 Helmets moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, LS2 Helmets, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GermanKity (talk) 07:17, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 15:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beingmai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was trying my best but I didn't understand and the previous page went a little wrong.But I will not make this mistake in the future. Please forgive me. Beingmai (talk) 15:42, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:44, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.