User talk:Bellula
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2f/Culinary_fruits_front_view.jpg/300px-Culinary_fruits_front_view.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/Face-smile.svg/25px-Face-smile.svg.png)
Hello, Bellula, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
- Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
- Check out some of these pages:
- If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 06:23, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
- Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
- In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
- Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
- Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>
, copy the whole thing). - In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
- If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References== {{Reflist}}
NOTBROKEN[edit]
Hi Bellula, please consider WP:NOTBROKEN and MOS:NOPIPE, there is no real value of removing redirects in articles for piped links, especially if the pipe link is longer than the redirect, and the redirect flowed more naturally in text. DankJae 00:03, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 9[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited France, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages French Republics and Lafrance. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 4[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited France, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages French Republics and Lafrance.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Still not broken[edit]
As requested above, please consider WP:NOTBROKEN and MOS:NOPIPE. There is still no real value in removing redirects in articles for piped links, as you did in Wikipedia:Oversight and elsewhere, especially if the pipe link is longer than the redirect or the redirect flowed more naturally in text. Certes (talk) 16:19, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
November 2023[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.