Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Broxtowe District Cricket, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Broxtowe District Cricket seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Broxtowe District Cricket, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click hereCSDWarnBot (talk) 17:10, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't remove players from squad lists according to your own opinion or bias. All the international squad lists have the same set criteria, so they're standardised and no personal point of view comes into it. Besides, you removed players who'd played the most recent international for their country, whilst left people who hadn't played for a year and were due to be removed. Cheers, HornetMike (talk) 23:53, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Acroterion(talk)15:30, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Whispering17:38, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have taken the liberty of deleting most of the content you added to the article and have replaced it with a brief introduction to the club. I have done this as the club should be notable being a member of an ECB Premier League and it was previously likely to be nominated for speedy deletion. Please feel free to expand on the article with any knowledge you have of the history of the club always endeavouring to keep your additions encyclopaedic. Regards. bigissue (talk) 22:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. the skomorokh15:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Anuj Dahl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Deadly∀ssassin11:18, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
By your user name, it appears that you represent a company or organization. Please read our conflict of interest guidelines. We welcome your contributions here, but please refrain from writing about your own company's services and personnel, as you did in Ben Crouch. Thanks, and happy editing! AKRadeckiSpeaketh02:00, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Ahsan Ali Tariq requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
It seems like a lot of your contributions are getting deleted. Perhaps it would be helpful to the goal of everyone contributing lasting, meaningful work, if you'd make yourself more familiar with our notability and reliable sources policies. Adhering to these is the surest way of making sure that your hard work and contribution of your valuable time isn't wasted by having your products deleted. Hope this helps. AKRadeckiSpeaketh15:18, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
List of english football transfers winter 2008-09[edit]
If you put transfers that are not on the BBC Reference: "Transfers-January 2009", then find a reference to cover the transfers otherwise I will remove them. – Michael (talk) 19:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You don't seem to know what you're doing, I have reverted the free transfers that you messed up on. Those deals were "Unattached". – Michael (talk) 20:18, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on January Transfer Window 2009 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
The 2009 January transfer window is not exclusive to English football. This redirect should not exist.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Paul Vaurie (talk) 06:10, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]