User talk:Bendamaster10

November 2010

This is your only warning. If you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Notre Dame High School (Norwich), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. | Uncle Milty | talk | 19:12, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Notre Dame High School (Norwich), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Notre Dame High School (Norwich) was changed by Bendamaster10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.984627 on 2010-11-24T12:43:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to User:Uncle Milty constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:46, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:47, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bendamaster10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i left my account logged on at college, and someone vandalised pages, not me, please give me amy account back or i will go apeshit on you

Decline reason:

Faiulure to maintain control of your account is a reason to extend your block, not a reason to lift it. I would do so if I believed you, which I do not. Since you have resorted to threats I have revoked your ability to appeal the block in this manner. If you wish to appeal further you will need to directly email WP:ARBCOM as described here. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:39, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.