User talk:Benmoshe

Lawsuit Discussion Interesting discrepancy I found on "The Hoya" Website, the newspaper for Georgetown. In the September 22 article found at http://www.thehoya.com/news/092206/news1.cfm stated as a fact that Mr. Maniaci was removed and taken to be "detained near the Bunn Intercultural Center." While the President of Georgetown Students for Justice in Palestine Hammad Hammad claimed that after being "escorted out of Healy Hall" that he saw Mr. Maniaci standing "unaccompanied after the incident". He wrote this in a editorial letter found at http://www.thehoya.com/viewpoint/092606/view8.cfm so this means that either the official report is lying and Mr. Maniaci was not taken and detained at Bunn Intercultural Center or the President of the Georgetown Students for Justice in Palestine is conspiring something. Interesting.

Please do not move pages from your user namespace to the article namespace. Why do you think this is okay?? Georgia guy 01:13, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And now look what you've done. Your user page is a double re-direct. Please be careful with what you are doing. Georgia guy 01:15, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not vandalize Wikipedia. Georgia guy 01:23, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.<->Refusetobesilenced 01:53, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I'm very sorry that your organization has been misrepresented on Wikipedia. We try to maintain a strict policy of neutral point of view, but sometimes it is difficult to determine what is neutral on some controversial issues. Thank you very much for helping us sort out the situation with the Jewish Defense League article. Please understand that the comments above were necessary because you violated some of Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. (I understand that your are a new user and that you probably were not aware of Wikipedia's deletion policy, for instance.) We want to try to present the Jewish Defense League in an objective manner. And now that you are becoming more familiar with the Wikipedia bureaucracy, we should be able to start moving towards a concensus regarding this article. Please be patient with our deletion and resolution processes and try to edit within the limits of our established guidelines. Once again, thanks. --Tantalum T e lluride 04:11, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Don't make unreasonable page moves. By Wikipedia policy, there is only one article per topic. Creating a second article on the exact same topic with a different title is against this policy. Moving the original article from its standard title to some nonstandard title is not allowed. Discuss at Talk:Jewish Defense League if you wish, but be aware of WP:3RR, WP:NPOV and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (not a soapbox for advocating particular points of view). -- Curps 04:18, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded to your message on my talk page. Since you are interested in trying to understand Wikipedia's guidelines better, perhaps I should give you a piece of the standard welcome template. You can find a lot of helpful information for new users if you follow these links:

And, of course, please continue to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~). I hope this helps. --Tantalum T e lluride 04:44, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

I'm very sorry you feel that the JDL has been misrepresented on Wikipedia (and, given the nature of the organization, its page is most likely a frequent target for vandals). Thank you for joining up to try to deal with the matter properly. If you're having any problems, please leave me a note on my talk page, since I'm an administrator. DS 20:36, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute Resolution

Hello again, Bill. I'm glad you haven't given up yet. You should always try to resolve disputes on Wkipedia through collaborative discussion on talk pages, through e-mail, on IRC, etc. But occassionally consensus cannot be reached on some controversial issues. Therefore, Wikipedia has established a dispute resolution process, consisting of several different avenues for reaching consensus. In my opinion, the most appropriate avenue for the JDL dispute is a Request for Mediation. Since you are the Deputy Chairman of the organization in question, I don't think you would be jumping the gun by requesting mediation. Wikipedia has a number of mediators who would be happy to work with you to fix the article. If they feel that you should try another means of dispute resolution, they will let you know. Of course, you may voluntarily select another avenue of dispute resolution if you prefer. If you need any help setting up a request for comment or mediation, or if you need any other help finding your way around the Wikipedia community, you know where to find me. --Tantalum T e lluride 04:30, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Adding images to Logos or any other "large" category

Hows it going? Thanks for participating in Wikipedia and improving and removing some of the biases that may be created by other users. However when adding images to categories that are marked "large" please put them into a sub category also, thanks. JedOs 03:32, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

proposed rewrite for Jewish Defense League page

Hi Bill -

I don't know if you have had a chance to see it, but this weekend I drafted a proposed rewrite for the Jewish Defense League page. It is at User:Twp/Jewish Defense League if you would like to review it.

I expect that the draft I wrote is not the one you'd like to see up there. That's understandable. My goal was to write a description of the JDL that sticks as closely as possible to existing sources of specific events, and one that (I hope) avoids speculation and generalization entirely. I've included the entire article structure that you wrote, and included the JDL mission statement from your web site, and I think included just about every link that you have submitted to document your position. It also includes some of the links that other people submitted in support of their positions. I've tried to turn the result into something that, I hope, is fair to everyone.

I'm very interested hearing your comments, and seeing if we can move toward a result that everyone can live with. Thanks for your time.

Tim Pierce 01:42, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

forks and other cutlery on Wikipedia

G'day Bill,

this note is about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish Defense League (The Real Story). You expressed confusion about AfD and the concept of a "fork". Basically, what the AfDers were saying was that Jewish Defense League (The Real Story) existed solely to write about the JDL from a different point of view. All articles on Wikipedia are (or should be) written in accordance with our Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy. If you don't feel that an article is neutral ("NPOV"), the appropriate thing is to discuss your issues on the talkpage, and to fix up the original article yourself. Creating a new version of the article to address point of view issues is called a "POV fork", and people don't tend to like them very much.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talkpage, or by email. Cheers, fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 15:09, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

JDL

The JDL article has changed significantly since you first started trying to fix it. Are you satisfied with the current state of the article? Or do you still feel that the organization is misrepresented? --Tantalum T e lluride 03:15, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I hereby award Benmoshe a barnstar for his efforts to present a neutral point of view with respect to the Jewish Defense League. (KC)

Thanks, Bill, for cooperating with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines while trying to fix the point of view concerning the JDL, for persevering despite several harsh warnings at the beginning of your quest, for participating in collaborative discussion rather than resorting to edit wars, for accepting the result of the VfD, for working to merge your forked article with the main one, and for not threatening to sue us. I hope you continue to monitor the JDL article and other related articles. Please continue to push for neutrality and objectivity in Wikipedia, and feel free to edit articles in other fields if you think you can improve them.

shalom

Shalom Bill. I thought you might want to know, I've removed the JDL from the "list of terrorist organizations" page. I felt that as per the JDL article, and this line in it "The National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT) says in its knowledge base that the last known attack by JDL was on February 26, 1992 and that "(t)oday, JDL is not actively engaged in terrorist actions."", it no longer qualifies to be on the terrorist list alongside the likes of Hamas, etc. Just thought I'd let you know. Swatjester 16:01, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]