|Welcome to Bensin's talk page. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article's talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or let me know where specifically you'd prefer the reply.|
Happy New Year!
Category:The 99 has been nominated for discussion
Category:The 99, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:37, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Dolly Parton Photo Permission Request from Zumic
I hope this message finds you having a good day.
My name is Jacob Grossfeld and I am the managing editor for Zumic, a music news website.
I'm writing to you because we discovered your photo of Dolly Parton (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dolly_Parton_accepting_Liseberg_Applause_Award_2010_portrait.jpg) online with a Creative Commons license, and we would appreciate your written permission to use it on our website, as well as your preferred attribution credit and any other specifications you might require.
A little background about Zumic: We cover all styles of music, giving artists and fans the respect they deserve. The name Zumic comes from our goal of "Music that revolves around you." Our philosophy champions a true appreciation for musicianship. We celebrate artists and make their work more accessible to people who will enjoy it. We truly believe that music has the power to educate, heal, and bring people together.
If you would like to request more information about Zumic, please do not hesitate to inquire.
Feeling bad for making things difficult
Hello, writing you here instead of the Swedish wikipedia where I'm being blocked (as you might know). I find your arguments on NI sound (not surprisingly since I made the same arguments myself). The stance taken by several people there seems to me to be completely absurd. They appear to completely ignore any evidence in favour of their a priori assumption. Not to mention how unsuitable the opinions on NI is in an article about a living person. As far as I can tell it violates many of the rules set out here: https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Artiklar_om_nu_levande_personer
However seeing how inconsistent their stance is regards to facts in general, I guess it's disappointing but not surprising.
Anyway, me arguing my case apparently *really* rubbed everyone the wrong way, possibly making it even harder for you to make your case. So for that I'd like to apologize. Hmc1282171021 (talk) 23:07, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- No need to apologize. I assume that my arguments are evaluated on their own merit. --Bensin (talk) 09:15, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aron Flam, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Transcendence and Brendan O'Neill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)