User talk:Berkenfruity

July 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tamar of Georgia have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tamar of Georgia was changed by Berkenfruity (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952969 on 2021-07-16T17:46:32+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:46, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tamar of Georgia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 17:46, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Iron Guard, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Iron Guard was changed by Berkenfruity (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975612 on 2021-07-17T09:40:55+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:40, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tamar of Georgia. if you have a source to correct inaccuracies, please provide them! melecie t 09:52, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding "disruptive" and "vandalistic" edits

I did not make any disruptive and vandalistic editing neither at "Tamar of Georgia", nor at "The Iron Guard" nor at "Corneliu Zelea Codreanu" Wikipedia articles respectively, as previous messages claimed that I did. It is interesting how the truth is censored and how any commentary regarding Wikipedia's explicit biasness and how it is against any Orthodox historical personalities. Berkenfruity (talk) 14:34, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Berkenfruity, you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:29, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ToBeFree, I came here from AIV; seeing your message I will refrain from blocking, but I was about to drop a NOTHERE block, especially in light of the commentary in the article and on this talk page. I assume you are willing to give the editor another chance, and that's fine with me. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 16:46, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Drmies, as I lack familarity with the topic, I wanted to make sure that even if Berkenfruity is correct, they have received a clear message about the kind of disruption that must be avoided regardless of being right or wrong. As they have stopped editing and responded to concerns on this talk page before leaving for now, I saw no immediate preventative need for a block. I wouldn't have objected to a block in any way, though, and I do sometimes block in similar situations. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:51, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]