User talk:Bito4u

Teamwork

Hello Bito4u, you obviously seem to be a devotee of Satpal. Wikipedia is a project of collaboration. I can understand that you have difficulties with that as part of a cult. Let me tell you that encyclopedic information doesn't take care of your likes and dislikes. On the other hand your comment of owning the TRUE version made me chuckle, thank you. I haven't heard such clear evidence for cult talk since a long time 87.123.90.194 (talk) 05:31, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Satpal Maharaj has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Satpal Maharaj was changed by Bito4u (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886332 on 2013-09-11T06:46:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:46, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.123.80.100 (talk) 12:05, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please note that Prem Rawat and related articles, including their talk pages, are subject to article probation. Any editor may be banned from any or all of the articles, or other reasonably related pages, by an uninvolved administrator for disruptive edits, including, but not limited to, edit warring, personal attacks and incivilty. Your recent edits to Satpal Maharaj may result to banning, if you continue making unilateral changes without collaborating on talk page. jni (talk) 12:20, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Diannaa (talk) 21:24, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bito4u. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans will be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rs chen 7754 21:34, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]