User talk:BloofToofTechnology

Ip

I am blocked for public IP. Please exempt

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BloofToofTechnology (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can I be exempt from IP block pleaseBloofToofTechnology (talk) 15:58, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. To request an IP block exemption, please follow the instructions at WP:IPECPROXY. 331dot (talk) 16:52, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BloofToofTechnology (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am caught in a loop trying to get an IP exemption. This is the message I get when trying to edit. “Registered users (with an account): Please make sure you are logged in to your account. If you are unable to edit while logged in you may request IP block exemption to bypass blocks unconnected with you that affect your editing. Post an unblock request to your user talk page.” This is what happened when I requested an exemption through the ticket system https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/public/appeal/view?hash=9f66786d039718ffbea4a3912a015f70 BloofToofTechnology (talk) 05:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You don't request it through the ticket system. Please follow the instructions at WP:IPECPROXY. "Email the checkuser OTRS team at checkuser-en-wp@wikipedia.org ensuring your email includes your username, or contact a CheckUser directly, explaining why you need to edit via anonymous proxies". 331dot (talk) 10:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:331dot It is not a proxy. I’ve followed the (conflicting) messages at WP:IPEXEMPTCONDITIONS and the message when I try to edit. BloofToofTechnology (talk) 19:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you send an email to either the checkuser email address above, or contact a checkuser directly? 331dot (talk) 19:58, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Robert Hansen into John E. Douglas. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Diannaa. Thank you for the message. I am a new user of Wikipedia editing. I did not know I needed to attribute Wikipedia editor for the content that was his that he edited to Wikipedia of which I partially copied from his Wikipedia edits he edited to Wikipedia for which I pasted on another Wikipedia without providing proper attributional to the Wikipedia editor who did the original Wikipedia editing. I have been, and continue to, trying to follow Wikipedia policy. I can tell you I will do my best to do better next time. I apologize that I did not provide the proper attributional. I apologize again because I am unable to provide attributional at this current time due to public IP. I am currently under IP block and was not granted IP block exemption and won't have access to separate IP to provide attributional as requested for this time. In response to IP exemption denial I have asked Wikipedia manager how and what to do to reverse the denial of the request to unblock the account from the blocked status of IP. Is the situation remediable? I apologize. BloofToofTechnology (talk) 08:26, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]