User talk:Blueash50

November 2014

Hello, I'm Strongjam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Joseph Howe because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —Strongjam (talk) 18:53, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joseph Howe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. — Strongjam (talk) 19:32, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Joseph Howe, you may be blocked from editing. — Strongjam (talk) 19:34, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Indian Act, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Indian Act was changed by Blueash50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95821 on 2014-11-27T19:42:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:42, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  m.o.p 19:49, 27 November 2014 (UTC)