User talk:Blwhite

Welcome!

Hello, Blwhite, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 06:33, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello. You have a new message at ErikHaugen's talk page. Message added 06:33, 22 January 2011 (UTC). Hello. You have a new message at ErikHaugen's talk page. Message added 17:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC). Hello. You have a new message at ErikHaugen's talk page. Message added 22:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC). Hello. You have a new message at ErikHaugen's talk page. Message added 19:08, 2 February 2011 (UTC). Hello. You have a new message at ErikHaugen's talk page. Message added 17:46, 8 February 2011 (UTC). Hello. You have a new message at ErikHaugen's talk page. Message added 07:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Huckleybuck (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is currently only one reference. More reliable third-party sources needed to be added to this article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Huckleybuck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 21:44, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Blwhite, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 21:44, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Huckleybuck (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The one source provided (offline) is enough to demonstrate that the subject exists, but is nowhere near enough to provide referencing for the remainder of the text. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail. Take a look at other card games such as Euchre, Contract bridge, and Pinochle to see what sort of referencing they employ. I should mention that simply because a poorly-written and/or unsourced article (like Jabberwocky) exists does not mean we should be making more. If anything, those pages should be improved or deleted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Huckleybuck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 15:51, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Huckleybuck (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You still have problems with sources. Pagat is a site run by an individual, and most likely not considered a reliable source because it is self-published, and has no editorial board. The huckleybuck.com also seems to be a site run by a single individual. You will need better, more established and published sources, not just web sites.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Huckleybuck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 23:04, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Huckleybuck (September 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dane2007 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This still needs more references to demonstrate notability at this point. It heavily relies on one source as well - please add additional sourcing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Huckleybuck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Dane2007 ^talk 04:23, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Huckleybuck has been accepted

Huckleybuck, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Primefac (talk) 19:59, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]