User talk:Bobnotts

Elgar[edit]

You added lots of links to ChoralWiki but these pages don't really work yet e.g. Elgar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nunquam Dormio (talk • contribs)

Hello there. The link to the Elgar page on ChoralWiki (or CPDL) does work when I checked it just now. --Bobnotts 22:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Sorry for the delay in replying...[edit]

Yeah, I would be interested! However, I think you have got me mixed-up with someone else. I also have GCSEs coming up a month from now, so I won't be doing much on any Wikis for a while, but when I've got more spare time, I'll take a look.--Vox Humana 8' 14:24, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Hello to anyone who is willing/able to help or can point me in the right direction. I'm an editor at CPDL (ChoralWiki) and we've been suffering a huge amount of spam attacks from what we believe to be automatically generated accounts by a bot. The wiki is set so that only registered users can edit pages but these vandalbots have managed to sign themselves up automatically. I have noticed that Wikipedia employs some (seemingly successful) spam protection by asking new users to enter letters/numbers from a blured/distorted image and I wondered if anyone could help me implement that protection at CPDL. Many thanks and apologies if this is not the right place for my query. --Bobnotts talk 08:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We have a spam filter. Also, we have many recent changers and Administrators. Since this is a Mediawiki type of question, and I assume that this is...you might want to contact Mediawiki. Miranda 09:11, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I will ask at Mediawiki. --Bobnotts talk 09:39, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CPDL logo.gif[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:CPDL logo.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CPDL logo.gif[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Hi Bobnotts!
We thank you for uploading Image:CPDL logo.gif, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 21:03, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Skin[edit]

Hi, just found a link for Sarah Kane's film skin. Have to warn you though, the quality isn't very good. http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x12ema_sarah-kane-skin-1995_creation

Well, have fun with that. It's disturbingly brilliant just like all her work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.92.56 (talk) 15:55, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ChoralWikiNoScores[edit]

Template:ChoralWikiNoScores has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Knife-in-the-drawer (talk) 18:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Bobnotts. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]