User talk:Bolafik

Your latest Edits on Thomas Anders page

I kept some of your additional information that you had made on Thomas Anders page, however, you had a lot of info that didn't need to be there as they never became even remotely popular, for example: the projects that he was involved in on aside. As for the tour, I went into his official web site "www.thomas-anders.com" and double checked it. The tour that was given in the cities you had mentioned, was after his Souled album not in '87 or '88. And it was in front of 85,000 people altogether, not 85,000 per concert. Let's have everything we are adding into this page in a very clear way. I have spent hours rectifying all the info (that the page contained two months ago) and hours adding more info. Thanks. Harout72

Thomas Anders tour 1987-1988

Thomas Anders toured as The Thomas Anders Show from April 1987 till February 1990 in stadium-like places: Katowice, Poland - April 1987; Budapest, Hungary - May 1987; Cesme, Turkey - July 1987; Moscow & St. Petersburg, USSR - October 4-10, 1987; Viña del Mar, Chile - February 21-22, 1988; Sun City, SAR - April 4, 1988; Viña del Mar, Chile - February 19-20, 1989; Eastern Germany - September 1989; Pretoria, SAR - October 12, 1989; Moscow,St. Petersburg, Kiev, Vilnius, Kaunas, Tbilisi, etc, USSR - February - March, 1990; Please see the back-cover of the official fan-club video-tape: http://www.thomasanders.ru/creative/discography/video/chile/chile_cov.htm

In 1996 Thomas Anders was involved in several dance-projects like Phantomas and Chain Reaction. It was a significant part of his career. Please see an interview given by the producer of the Phantomas-project Ramon Zenker (Fragma, Hardfloor) to www.moderntalking.ru (officially supported by BMG-Russia): http://www.moderntalking.ru/thomassolo/phantomas/interview2003_eng.htm

Different tour

You're a refering to an entirely different tour, the cities you had mentioned the first time in the article which I kept but moved to a correct timeline match perfectly to the ones they mention in his official web site which is not after MT's first split but it is after Souled album. And before only 85,000 enthusiasts. The one you are mentioning includes some of the same cities plus lots others before a huge number of people,however.

I also read the interview through the help of your link (thanks), and it's clearly explained by Ramon that they stopped it becuase they saw no success in the near future. That's probably also why they don't bring it up in his official web site. So let's sleep on that info for now.

Let's keep in mind that normally the official web sites are controled by what artists desire to include in. So if it's not there, it's probably because Thomas doesn't feel it is important. Consequently, we don't want to fill the wikipedia with the kind of stuff that are not worth mentioning.

Take care, Harout72

Discography & World tour

Please check info about Phantomas and Chain Reaction releases on: http://www.germancharts.com/showinterpret.asp?interpret=Thomas+Anders

Just note: Probably you misread the information about the world tour on the official site. After the Souled album Thomas Anders toured mostly in Germany and Russia. The world tour took place from Spring 1987 till February 1990.

Sincerely, Bolafik

Are we both refering to the same site?

Thomas's official web site is www.thomas-anders.com. On the English version of the site, it talks of only one tour (click on the no. 4 of all numbers placed vertically). Whereas, the German version of the site mentions the same tour after souled as well as the tour given In chile in 1989. However, the one given after "Souled" is not just within Germany and Russia (tell me that you don't think Hong Kong, Singapore, Taipai are located within Russia nor Germany). So, as much as I respect an avid fan of Thomas Anders like yourself, please don't tell me I misread the TOUR INFO as I am fluent in both German and English.

I did check the Germancharts through your link, and it does not indicate chart positions on any of the releases, from which we could at least know how well the sales of the songs have been.

P.S. I never said I didn't believe that Thomas Anders was involved within other projects, but rather I said, they have never even remotely become popular. They are not worth mentioning. It's clear that YOU have MISREAD what I've written to you in the previous message (above).

Take care, Harout72

Please leave me your messages on my talk page and not yours. Thanks.

Image copyright problem with Image:Thomas anders souled cover.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Thomas anders souled cover.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 06:41, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Thomas anders souled cover.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Thomas anders souled cd cover.jpg. The copy called Image:Thomas anders souled cd cover.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 06:45, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Thomas anders-how deep is your love cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thomas anders-how deep is your love cover.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thomas anders live concert cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thomas anders live concert cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thomas anders-how deep is your love cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thomas anders-how deep is your love cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Modern Talking us cov.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Modern Talking us cov.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:41, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Anders

OK
But... I simply wished to make all correctly and precisely...
Oleg N (talk) 07:05, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ralf Stemmann

Hi Bolafik. I've deleted a couple of the tags but my views on notability tend to be relatively narrow, so I've left that one there. If someone else deletes the notability tag I will not dispute it further. Bongomatic (talk) 15:51, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christian de Walden

Hi Bolafik

Thanks for pointing me to your edits to Christian de Walden. My view may not be a consensus one, but I think for a producer to be notable he has to be someone:

who meets the traditional WP:N criteria of "significant coverage in reliable [independent] sources";
who has won awards for production (not someone who has produced award-winning songs); or
who is recognized to be responsible for a major sound (see, for example, Daniel Lanois.

Note that WP:MUSIC doesn't address producers.

While the statements in the article are well-supported, the article doesn't assert anything that I would consider to be notable. Happy to have a look any time.

Best Bongomatic (talk) 15:33, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thanks for the barnstar. Bongomatic (talk) 06:29, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Three Degrees Out the past into future cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Three Degrees Out the past into future cover.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 14:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Modern Talking us cov.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Modern Talking us cov.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 00:48, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thomas anders different cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thomas anders different cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:53, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas Anders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sun City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bolafik. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]