User talk:Bonoahx

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Bonoahx}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

British Jamaicans[edit]

Hi I am currently gathering sources which point towards a disproportionate representation of Carribeans in violent drug related crimes and gang affiliations in London please bare with me and if you would like to see the information I will add prior to me editing let me know. 90tillinfinitydue (talk) 08:57, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, no problem. As long as you have reliable sources, and you write from a neutral point of view there shouldn't be any reason to immediately remove any content you add. Other editors may still revert as it could lean towards WP:UNDUE, but I'm not familiar with the subject matter so I won't comment on that. Bonoahx (talk) 09:05, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why you deleted my true editing of article[edit]

Why you deleted my true editing of article Ubeed 1 (talk) 13:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I believed that the edit you made didn't meet WP:NPOV primarily because the edit regarding the highway preferably requires a source and the statement that it 'is a beautiful road through forests' is opinionated. Bonoahx (talk) 13:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can definitely check from govt sources that NH701-A is realistic and not fake one Ubeed 1 (talk) 14:54, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure the road itself is realistic. It is the statement that it is a beautiful road that is the problem. If you reword the article to just mention the road and provide any source you have about the road then it should be OK. I'm not trying to be antagonistic, I occasionally do recent changes patrolling and reverted based on a quick assessment. Bonoahx (talk) 14:56, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OpenInsight deprod[edit]

Hi, I removed proposed deletion you placed on that article, because there was already a prod/deprod back in 2009. No opinion on notability (best source I found was a 1/3 page news article about a new release in the Network World magazine - 18 September 1995, pp. 37-38). Pavlor (talk) 05:28, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, I should’ve checked the history. Thanks Bonoahx (talk) 07:09, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Record against top 10 players[edit]

Players are sorted according to their win% (from 100% to 0%). JamesAndersoon (talk) 15:27, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Max Rehberg[edit]

Hello, Bonoahx. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Max Rehberg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Max Rehberg[edit]

Hello, Bonoahx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Max Rehberg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:07, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]