Jump to content

User talk:BottleOfChocolateMilk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I wasn't sure how to message you other than replying to a post. I am doing a newspaper article on the benefits that Wikipedia has had on education. I'd love to briefly interview you for the article. Do you have an email address or # I can reach you at?

[edit]

Hi BottleOfChocolateMilk. I wasn't sure how to message you other than replying to a post. I am doing a newspaper article on the benefits that Wikipedia has had on education. I'd love to briefly interview you for the article. Do you have an email address or # I can reach you at? Houseofwuss (talk) 09:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Go to their "User contributions", click "Tools" and then "Email this user". Biohistorian15 (talk) 14:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Failing NFCC#1 files

[edit]

From this discussion of antother file that fails NFCC#1, apparently you can just use {{rnfu}} on them and it adds a template, might be better than {{no permission}}. reppoptalk 05:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 18:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2024 United States Senate election in Maine. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. User:Namiba 16:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have made 4 reversions in a short period of time. That violates WP:3RR. If you revert yourself now and seek to build consensus, I won't press the issue further. If you do not revert yourself, you open yourself up to being potentially blocked for disruptive editing.--User:Namiba 16:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you're engaging in disruptive editing on other articles as well. Please refrain and revert yourself as is required.--User:Namiba 16:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)\[reply]
lol BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 16:50, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You may not have noticed, the definition of what's correct varies from person to person. Do use this opportunity to analyze your actions in line with Wikipedia policy and practice your social skills (it makes things like this smoother and better for yourself and others). Fantastic Mr. Fox (talk) 18:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked for one month from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
You have been making false accusations of vandalism, edit warring, and failing to assume good faith of your fellow editors. Cullen328 (talk) 19:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Party shading/No Labels

[edit]

Template:Party shading/No Labels has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:15, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ik it by but party important to Omaha election, maybe with show party color with party. JNOJ1423 (talk) 01:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's customary on WP to use gray colors for a nonpartisan election since the party affiliation isn't listed on the ballot. The article still includes each candidate's party affiliation next to their name in the candidate list. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
yeah, but party registration and that count so better by nonpartisan but color state Nebraska Infoblox JNOJ1423 (talk) 01:30, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]