User talk:BreezeBlaze

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Washington, Illinois. Ae245 (talk) 13:57, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After reviewing the article, you are wrong. neutral point of view This was in no shape or form "taking sides" or anything along that matter. You are a bitch who needs to shut the fuck up. BreezeBlaze (talk) 14:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my rude behavior. I will better myself. BreezeBlaze (talk) 16:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, BreezeBlaze!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Walsh90210 (talk) 23:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 13:59, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BreezeBlaze (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is no need to block me from editing. If this is about my own page, I was simply getting rid of one real grief attempt, that will never be done again, and some others who are being unnecessary. BreezeBlaze (talk) 14:12, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see nothing wrong with the block. In particular, your user page (User:BreezeBlaze) shows you haven't the slightest intention of contributing appropriately here. Yamla (talk) 14:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BreezeBlaze (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will now calm down, and better myself. I am not asking to be unblocked, but have a reduced block. My intentions were all well except my response to my talk comments, and my user page, which I cannot get rid of, due to the block. I simply ask if this block cannot be permanent, as I feel it's a bit harsh. I will better my behavior and will do my best to make constructive edits, and be friendly. BreezeBlaze (talk) 15:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. In your deliberately abusive edit here, you indicated you quit. As such, there's no need to leave this unblock request open. Additionally, I have revoked your talk page access to prevent your continued deliberate disruption. WP:UTRS remains open to you if you change your mind and are willing to address your deliberate disruption. Yamla (talk) 17:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please stop removing the declined unblock request. If you continue, your ability to edit this page will be revoked. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 16:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC) BreezeBlaze[reply]

Why? I don't want it on my page.

WP:BLANKING. You are required to leave it on your page, unless and until your block is lifted. This is not optional, you have no say in this. --Yamla (talk) 16:57, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS Request

I have restored your access to your talk page so that you can continue your unblock request on-wiki. Please follow these instructions:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Reading our guide to improving articles.
Picking any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.

Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}}),
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]),
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]),
  - and do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits have any citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking using {{unblock}} and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will hopefully improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 18:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]