User talk:Brighton beautiful

How can you claim this when the page you're referring to already uses the word "city" multiple times in reference to Brighton? It is evident that Brighton is repeatedly called a city in the text, which is contradictory and perplexing, but also indicates that Brighton is commonly recognized as a city. After reading the entire Brighton page, it refers to Brighton 26 times as a town, mostly focusing on the old town, and referred to as a city 37 times most of these having reference.This page also provides information on the city's statistics. Brighton operates under one city council and one local government.

Block evasion[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brighton beautiful (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I feel that I have been unjustly banned without reason. I made an edit using reliable * sources that was subsequently removed, leading to my ban. I believe that this individual is targeting me and I would appreciate your assistance in resolving this issue Brighton beautiful (talk) 07:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have been blocked(not banned) for block evasion, but do not discuss that in this request. 331dot (talk) 08:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It is frustrating and disappointing regarding my recent ban from editing Wikipedia. My ban stemmed from attempting to correct misinformation on the Brighton page, specifically the incorrect classification of Brighton. While I acknowledge that I have made multiple accounts in the past, it was solely due to my desire to rectify inaccuracies on the platform.

Initially, I felt targeted and marginalized for simply attempting to ensure the accuracy of information on Wikipedia. Despite my efforts to contribute constructively, I found myself facing repeated bans and obstacles. However, upon realizing that my IP address was granted editing privileges again, I took the initiative to create a new account in good faith.

Regrettably, my efforts were met with yet another ban, exacerbating the sense of frustration and helplessness I have experienced throughout this ordeal. It is disheartening to be penalized for striving to uphold the integrity of Wikipedia's content, particularly when my intentions were genuine and my actions aligned with the platform's guidelines.

I am eager to rectify this situation and resume contributing positively to Wikipedia. Therefore, I kindly request that my ban be lifted, allowing me the opportunity to continue making meaningful contributions to the platform. Additionally, I urge the relevant parties to address the underlying issues of harassment and discrimination within the Wikipedia community to ensure a more inclusive and respectful environment for all users.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to a swift resolution and the opportunity to once again participate in the Wikipedia community.

The difference between our Brighton and Brighton and Hove articles has been explained ad nauseam to you, and I'm not going to explain it again. There are lots of other topics you could be editing on Wikipedia. As long as you continue trying to disrupt these articles with your city status crap, you will remained blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:21, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TPA revoked for using your talk page as a WP:SOAPBOX while blocked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:39, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]