User talk:BroncoBarn

September 2021

Hello, I'm Longhair. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Taryn Manning, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Longhair\^talk 20:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Taryn Manning. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Cassiopeia talk 20:48, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can I add a citation from a users Facebook page? BroncoBarn (talk) 20:48, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Taryn Manning, you may be blocked from editing. Facebook is not a reliable source Longhair\^talk 20:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not disruptive its factual look at the source. You're disruptive in removing. BroncoBarn (talk) 22:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Taryn Manning. Longhair\^talk 22:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taryn Manning

Your recent editing history at Taryn Manning shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Longhair\^talk 22:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Taryn Manning. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Longhair\^talk 23:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did at Taryn Manning. Binksternet (talk) 03:24, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]