User talk:Bros4America

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Bros4America, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 08:49, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alex Mohajer for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Mohajer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Mohajer (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SW3 5DL (talk) 02:36, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfD[edit]

The article you are referring to is not about why Hillary Clinton lost, nor does it allege that Russians installed Donald Trump, nor is it based on a Lyndon LaRouche article. This is wild misstatement of fact (said respectfully, intentions Im sure are innocent) which only goes to show the notability of the author and evidence for which inclusion is necessary. People should be able to rebut and counter misstatements such as this (said respectfully) and in an objective space such as Wikipedia where the criticism and the controversy are looked at from middle ground. There are several controversial articles, incidents and notable events listed in article dating back. Outside of this one event, there are countless high profile news sources where subject is an interview subject or asked to provide quote as a subject matter expert not just pertaining to this article. Bros4America (talk) 14:13, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bros4America, I have moved your comment from the AfD here. On Wikipedia, the AfD is for discussing whether or not the article meets Wikipedia guidelines It is not the place for you to argue your personal belief that the article deserves to remain. Please read the notability guidelines at WP:Notability. If you have sources that cover Mr. Mohajer, not the article he has written, but instead articles that outline who he is, what he does, why he is notable, then show them with links on the AfD. But do not keep arguing the same point. That is called disruption and you can be blocked from editing. Please also read the guidelines in the welcome message I left you above. They will give you a good introduction to Wikipedia. Also, do not comment on the editor. Focus only on showing your proof that Mr. Mohajer should have an article. I hope this helps. SW3 5DL (talk) 15:24, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I put in "keep" before your first comment on the AfD. That's all you need to do for now. Take the time to find your sources to show notability. Post them here. I'll show you how to add them on the AfD. . SW3 5DL (talk) 16:15, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]