User talk:Browntruck
April 2019
[edit]
Hello, I'm LakesideMiners. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Science education— has been undone because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thank you. LakesideMinersMy Talk Page 16:46, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Event management. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Furthermore, your deliberate use of inaccurate edit summaries suggest this is a bad-faith attempt to vandalize Wikipedia. Amp71 (talk) 16:50, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Drama school. Serols (talk) 17:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Lofty abyss 17:12, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Browntruck (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This account was created when I was learning Wikipedia initially, and as a new user unknowingly has done some mistakes, being new I did not know about unblocking procedure then, Now I understand my mistakes, and learned the ethical way to create articles. I assure you that I will not use my account for any illegal or spamming edits or any other way of abuse.due to ignorance of Wikipedia's complete procedure, I had created another account and did not know it is an abuse of Wikipedia, but using the new account Biggreentree I have not done any activity that is against the policy. I had genuinely created two articles named Thuthurmattam and Suhani Jathlia which were approved, and when I submitted the Third article Dr. P.C.Thomas which is also a genuine one,there was note by Editor for cleanups and advertisement materials which were asked to be removed for which the article was moved to draft space, as per my conversation with the editor who placed the tags had asked me to write to him when I feel the article is neutral and ready to be viewed. Accordingly, after necessary corrections, I sent him a message that the article is ready to be viewed, and I got a message that it is done and the draft article was moved to article space. In the meanwhile, the second account was blocked stating that this account IP was related to a blocked account. When I placed a request to remove the block from my new account Biggreentree i was advised to get the block removed from the original account first account, I would request to deleted my first account "Browntruck which I won't be using further,and allow me to use my new account "Biggreentree I assure Wikipedia that in future no such mistakes will be committed and I would contribute productively to Wikipedia. Browntruck (talk) 14:46, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You're 
Confirmed to Biggreentreeus (talk · contribs), who is in turn confirmed to a sock farm. If you truly want to be unblocked, you should disclose all the accounts that you've used to edit Wikipedia and address the concerns of undisclosed paid editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:32, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user means Biggreentreeus, not Biggreentree. The following claim is also blatantly false: "I have not done any activity that is against the policy" Obviously, every edit with that account violated WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. Even if that wasn't the case, that talk page is littered with warnings about inappropriate edits. As I reviewed the unblock request over there, I won't review this one. --Yamla (talk) 17:05, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Unblock Request
[edit]Browntruck (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I agree and understand the error done by me unknowingly, as I mentioned earlier as a new user I was even not sure how the talk page works which I came to know now. And regarding the Spam it was due to my misinterpretation of the warnings, I thought I had to correct what was tagged in the warning and could create an article again, this lead to multiple creations of the page using this account. Only after the account was blocked I understood what I did is spam for which I seek forgiveness. Later I decided to create another account Biggreentree" and the edits and articles which I wrote using this ID were genuine and an honest contribution, I am using only this account for Wikipedia and the previous one Browntruck I am not using. I request the team to delete the first ID Bigbrowntruck" and any other account if any which I am not aware of connected with my IP address and just allow me to use the current user-id "Biggreentree". This is my last appeal to the committee, I have disclosed all the information honestly. Even after this if the committee still feels the account should be kept blocked I abide by the decision. Thanks for all who have patiently reviewed my appeal. Browntruck (talk) 02:26, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. There are multiple issues--, WP:UPE, WP:EVADE, WP:SOCK. You wold also need to affirm that you would not link to or edit aboutthe website you linked to with this account, or any other SPAM I do not know about. You would need to tell us what constructive edits you would make. Oh, I don't see where you listed all the other accounts you used.-- Dlohcierekim 03:07, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{unblock|reason=I affirm that I would not link to or edit about the website I linked using this account, I am not a paid contributor, the article Rehab yoga was created because of one of my friend. When I told him that I would like to contribute for Wikipedia he suggested me to write about Rehab yoga as it was notable. And regarding linking to Way to college" website was also as per his advise, as a new user I was trying to give a reference that's when he told me about the way to college which was about educational courses by giving reference about this I thought people who are reading this will get more information, I am not connected with the website or paid for the work done. I agree that as a new user in my first account "Browntruck as I was learning I did a lot of errors which was not deliberate, In my second account Biggreentree"you could see I haven't done any mistakes. So if the team wants to penalize me for what I did Unknowling I accept it, if given a second chance I would like to say that I could contribute to Wikipedia by only correcting grammar, adding valid references, and by adding info which was a valid citation I am not sure about if I have created any other account using this IP address, I do not remember any of the other user names or passwords. So I leave it to the discretion of the committeeBrowntruck (talk) 05:11, 11 August 2019 (UTC)