Jump to content

User talk:Bsroiaadn/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Finally

Finally, it's done. Take a look, tell me if you see anything wrong still...but I went over the whole article double-checking every stat and everything..I don't see how it could be anything less than perfect. Think it's ready to be put up at featured list candidates? I realize you won't have much, if any, computer access until about Sunday as you're on your way to Cali right now, just wanted to make sure you knew I finished it. BsroiaadnTalk 12:13, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Good work! I think you should bring it over there ASAP. Just let me know when and I'll see if I can help out in the FLC. JHMM13 13:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Alright, I put it up here. I hope I did the nom well, I followed the directions. Haha. BsroiaadnTalk 14:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

New Jersey Devils draft picks

If you need any help (or just want any), I'll gladly help you out with it, or any other Devils-related article really. I'm 99% sure that List of New Jersey Devils players will pass FLC so I think I can move on to working on something else and just check back to make sure everything's alright, I would say 100% sure but you never know what could happen by the time it's over. BsroiaadnTalk 05:03, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Well I've got the draft picks page under control, but I had another idea. Since I really think the Devils can make featured topic very shortly (main article, Marty, players, and the draft history are all either featured or will be soon), I was looking at other NJD-related articles that can be brought up to speed, and the coaches came to mind. Head Coaches of the New Jersey Devils isn't bad, but it sure isn't FLC material. I've been working on my sandbox, and it's been slowly coming along. There's actually a few different ideas I had for the page, I was going to work on them more once I got done with the draft picks. But you're certainly more than welcome to root around in there and finish what I started, or come up with your own idea. The nice thing is that the Devils page contains a history of every head coach and assistant who's worked for them (with the exception of this year... Julien's not up yet, or Lamoriello's second reign). So once we get that done and the draft picks, I'll submit it to featured topic, and we should be able to get that accomplished pretty easily. Anthony Hit me up... 13:51, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Alright, sounds good to me. What were some of your ideas for the coaches list in your sandbox? Maybe I could take care of some of those. And the notes are just notes from their time while coaching the Devils? As in, not noting the Herb Brooks was also the coach for the famous Miracle on Ice game, correct? Anyway, I'll help with that..but before we put it up for FLC, we should also make articles for all the redlinks, since that'll probably be one of the things they say to do. But we can wait till later to do that. Also, I couldn't figure it out, some of the coaches have 4 numbers in their record (I.E. Pat Burns 89-45-22-8) what would the fourth number mean? BsroiaadnTalk 22:09, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Well, I had two ideas for how the page should be set up. One is the way it is now, with the Head coaches as the primary line, and the assistants in the table along with them. Another way is to separate the head and assistant coaches into two separate tables; the assistants would have a column indicating which head coaches they served under. I also thought about doing a timeline of all the coaches, head, assistant, and goaltending. But honestly I don't mind what you do with it, honestly I'm so busy with the draft picks page I don't have time to work on the coaches. But I think it's going to have to be FLC in order to make featured topic. Let me know what you plan on doing with it, and I'll help you if I can. FYI, the fourth number is overtime losses: it's Wins-Losses-Ties-Overtime Losses. For the most recent coaches, it's W-L-OTL, since there's no ties anymore. Anthony Hit me up... 03:47, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Hmmmmm...well, if I make a new table for the assitants, I'll leave the assistants in the main coaches table and just add records (if they have them) to the assistants table. I'm not sure if I'll split up the assistant coaches and the goaltending coaches, though, I probably won't. I think I may get rid of OTL for pre-lockout coaches as most people don't consider it important during that time, if you don't mind. I think it'd just cause confusion if it's left there. BsroiaadnTalk 04:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Thing is, I don't think you can just "get rid" of OTL. During that time, the NHL considered it a separate entry under the win-loss column. Teams that lost in overtime still received a point just for making it to OT. In fact, under the current system, that's what the third column is. It's just that for a brief while, you had four. I would recommend not eliminating OTL as a listing, though, because it's part of the NHL's record-keeping, regardless of whether we like it or not. Anthony Hit me up... 13:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Hmmmm...in that case, I've thought of a very good idea for the records column to clear up any confusion about T/OTL. And I knew that third column now is OTL, I just wasn't aware that OTL counted for anything before the lockout as I wasn't as much into stats and stuff back then as I am now. Also, wondering if you can clear something up for me. I proposed a date on Today's featured article request for the Devils for June 30th as it's the anniversary of the day the team was renamed the New Jersey Devils and one person doesn't think it's significant. It's not up to him/her regardless, I just don't see how he/she can think it's not important enough to be a good date for Today's featured article. BsroiaadnTalk 22:23, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
I finished Head Coaches of the New Jersey Devils. I put it up already as I went over it completely and saw no errors. I'm still debating the Stanley Cup blue background thing as it may confuse some people, but I'm not sure if I wanna get rid of it or not yet. What do you think of it? BsroiaadnTalk 04:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

How to get the number on the blue screen of death

My laptop randomly has it occur and it's for a split second then it goes black and restarts itself. Should I sit with a camera next to me and hope I get it? Or what? Also, I archived the talk page...it was way too long. Bsroiaadn 03:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

  • I read the article and it mentioned a kernel debugger. I've looked online, but I haven't found much..and the stuff I have found isn't explained very well. I'm not gonna lie, I don't know much about DOS or .ddl's or any of that. Is there any website that will easily explain it in a way I could understand or maybe if someone here could help me out? Or maybe even an application that could do all the work for me? Bsroiaadn 03:52, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Also, not sure how I neglected to mention this. I have Windows XP Media Center Edition on my laptop. I did the winver check and this is the exact version "Microsoft Windows Version 5.1 (Build 2600.xpsp_sp2_qfe.070227-2300 : Service Pack 2)" just incase it's needed to get that specific. I have an HP laptop, don't remember the exact model name right now...but I'm not sure if that's very important. Bsroiaadn 04:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
This is a problem that most users of Windows XP Professional have. If you don't have XP Professional, there is something wrong with your computer. However, if you do have Professional, try this.

1. Click Start > Run and type C:\WINDOWS\system32\sysdm.cpl
2. Click OK
3. In the dialog that follows, click the Advanced tab
4. Under the section titled Startup and Recovery, click Settings
5. Under the section titled System Failure, uncheck Automatically restart
6. Click OK
7. Click OK again
8. Restart your computer
Every BSoD should now appear and allow you to collect the error information.
NOTE: These steps may not work on previous versions of Windows, but it wouldn't hurt to give it a try!
--FastLizard4 (Talk|Contribs) 04:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
(Note that this same message was placed on the BSoD Talk Page)

It actually hasn't happened since I posted that, ironically. *knocks on wood* But thanks, at least now I know what to do incase it happens again, for now I'm not gonna do all of what you said...just don't wanna touch any of that right now as it's working fine, haha. But, if it does happen, I'll be sure to try it. Thank you. BsroiaadnTalk 04:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

What's wrong with that

I saw your comment on Talk:Mike Ilitch (Yes, I know it's old) and just wanted to know, what's so bad about being born in America? I'm not angry, it doesn't bother me at all...I just want to know why you say that. BsroiaadnTalk 22:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Nothing wrong, don't take it personally.
Just taking a cheapshot, nothing else.
No personal attacks.
Norum 23:11, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Haha, alright. I was just wondering, I didn't take it personally or anything, don't worry.. BsroiaadnTalk 00:10, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

How was Cali and Boston

Or should I say how is Cali and how was Boston? I don't know if you're still in Cali or not. Anyway, I recently finished (although FutureNJGov started it, I did most of the table, references, and notes and he did the lead...he's better than me at those...he was busy doing other stuff so I finished the table) Head Coaches of the New Jersey Devils, what do you think? The original plan between FutureNJGov and I was to get it to FLC, you think I should try it out? And if you think it's worth trying, would it look a little odd for me to have 2 self-noms in FLC? I haven't gotten past the 10-day minimum for List of New Jersey Devils players to pass yet, it has all the support it needs..it's just waiting for the ten days to be over, now. BsroiaadnTalk 00:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Great job!!!!! I got to California on Saturday and I've been beaching and hanging out since. I've got UCI summer classes starting on the 25th, so until then it's pretty much hanging out. As someone who's spent a moderate amount of time at FAC (which has significantly more traffic than FLC), I was only annoyed by multiple nominations when the user who nominated them a) didn't contribute significantly to either one of the articles (you have) or b) put a real effort into making it feature-worthy (you have). I'm more impressed by someone who can take two articles in a short period of time and make them feature-worthy than someone who takes more time to do it. Wikipedia users should thank you for spending the time on it, and I certainly thank you for putting in the effort. If you feel it has matched up to the requirements, by all means put it up. My only problem with the page at the moment is the percentage of red links. As you proved in the other FLC, I'm sure you can handle that, but it might be smart to get those out of the way before you put it up. Let me know what you're doing next! JHMM13(Disc) 01:37, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Another thing: If you're going to have a note about Julien, you should probably have a note about Ftorek and Robinson going on to win the cup. Incidentally, I grew up playing hockey with Ftorek's son...it was an interesting time. ;-D JHMM13(Disc) 01:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Robinson's name on the cup in 03 I think was because he was an assistant, right? JHMM13(Disc) 02:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
That's cool man, good luck with the summer classes...you gonna do a lot of partying before it starts? (and possible during? haha). And alright, I'll take care of those redlinks, although I'm not sure where I would go to see what teams an assistant coach has been on...a head coach is one thing..but assistant coach...hmmm...I guess I'll be doing a lot of googling. Haha. I'm probably gonna do two more lists (players lists again) before I work on something else...but I'm not sure what I'm going to work on afterwards...my real foal is to make a featured article, but that's a lot more work and I'm not sure I have the writing skills to do it, at least not by myself. And I added notes to Robinson and Ftorek, I hope I understood what kind of notes you wanted me to add. And did you really? What was it like? BsroiaadnTalk 02:10, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
And he wasn't an assistant in 03, he was head in early 02, then went to assistant and by the middle of 2002 he left. BsroiaadnTalk 02:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Ftorek's kid was pretty good at hockey, but I think he's stuck to lacrosse last I heard. Mr. Ftorek I haven't seen in a long time. Every once in a while he'd come and coach one of our practices which was pretty cool. JHMM13(Disc) 03:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Lacrosse seems to have gotten very popular lately. But, I've never played it. I suppose I would try it if I got the chance to. That's pretty cool that he coached some of your practices, though. By the way, do you think I should add a nationalities column to the list of head coaches? BsroiaadnTalk 03:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Remargin. Yeh I think that would add a nice bit of color to the list. Now that I think about it, I have a problem with the title of the article. First off, Head Coach is not a proper noun and should not be capitalized, just like "player" isn't. Second, why aren't we calling it "List of New Jersey Devils head coaches"? Wouldn't that fit the convention better? Let me know what you think. JHMM13(Disc) 03:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
I understand that other teams use that format, but that doesn't mean it's right. Even the list of NHL coaches has it as "List of NHL coaches" which follows the format of "List of XXX coaches." This is typically the format used on Wikipedia from my experience...I'll bet the "Head Coaches of the XXX" thing got started on one article and then that was considered convention. I think we should change the titles of all the articles. JHMM13(Disc) 03:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I'll get to adding the nationalities after the redlinks are done. And, actually, I was thinking about the same thing...I came close to moving the page but decided at the last minute that I'd like another opinion and forgot to ask. I just now moved it to List of New Jersey Devils head coaches. I'm really not sure who decided to name it that way. BsroiaadnTalk 03:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
And, yea, we probably should change them all, but that might spark controversy. Maybe we should bring it up at the wikiproject ice hockey talk page? BsroiaadnTalk 03:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Good idea. Bring it over there first. JHMM13(Disc) 03:53, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
How should we bring it up though? I really have no idea what I should say to start it off, I might have an idea if I wasn't as tired as I am right now. I doubt they'll disagree, but I can't think of how to start it. BsroiaadnTalk 04:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Done...check it out. Be sure to put in your opinion too :-D. JHMM13(Disc) 04:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
I put something in there quickly, I'll probably expand on it tomorrow. For now, I'm going to sleep. Haha. I got rid of all the redlinks for the coaches, by the way. Now just have to do the nationalities. If you have any other ideas for the coaches (or if I'm forgetting some we've mentioned) feel free to tell me about them. BsroiaadnTalk 04:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Nashville Predators

Guess I was using the New Jersey Devils example. The Devils choice to celebrate their 10th anniversary in 2006-07 (ignoring the '04-'05 lockout). But you're correct, the Predators 10th season would be 2008-09. GoodDay 19:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Maybe saying "10th-year anniversary season" or "Ten year anniversary season" would be better? Instead of "10th anniversary season". So it would be going more by year than by season, ya know? That's what we did on the List of family relations in the National Hockey League when the Ducks won the cup, too. Talking about how the Neidermayers played against eachother in the Finals just 4 years earlier, instead of saying 3 seasons. BsroiaadnTalk 19:26, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Howabout the franchises 10th anniversary, with no mention of seasons. GoodDay 19:30, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Yea, that sounds a lot better than what I suggested, good idea. BsroiaadnTalk 19:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
I think, the Predators birthdate would be in 1997 (When the NHL awarded the city, the franchise). Either way, perhaps I should wait until the '07-'08 season, to see if the Predators wear a '10th anniversary patch' or not (before I add in anything). GoodDay 19:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Well, they've mentioned that June 25th is their ten-year anniversary, so I don't see them not having patches or marketing it in some way, but I suppose we'll see what they do. BsroiaadnTalk 19:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

Wow... thank you so much. I must say I don't do the things I do to get awards (though it is nice, haha), I do it because I want to make Wikipedia better, so I offer hints and tips here & there where I can. I'm just happy to do a good job, and I'm glad you think so too. Thanks again. I was planning on doing this after the coaches list made FL, but I feel obligated to do it now in response to you, so here it is:

The Running Man Barnstar
For your hard and diligent work on List of New Jersey Devils players and List of New Jersey Devils head coaches in bringing them to featured list status. Anthony Hit me up... 17:18, 23 June 2007 (UTC)


One good turn deserves another, IMHO. Keep it up, and soon we'll have the whole topic featured! Anthony Hit me up... 17:18, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Haha, thanks. What else do you think we should bring up to FL/FA status before it being allowed to be a featured topic though? BsroiaadnTalk 17:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Here's what, IMO, needs to be FA/FL, or at least GA, in order to make the Devils a featured topic:

What we're going to have to do is create articles for each Devils season (I started 2003-04 New Jersey Devils season, but all it has is the infobox & one sentence). The reason we need them is to go along with the growing precedent set by Calgary Flames draft history, and to get New Jersey Devils seasons up to FL; it won't pass with any redlinks for team seasons. So I'd say we have about another 2 weeks or so worth of work to do before the whole topic is featured, but we're a good portion of the way there. Once the '07 draft is over and done with, I'll create the draft history page and throw it up there so it looks similar to the Flames, with a few changes I have in mind that will make it better. Anthony Hit me up... 21:14, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

New Jersey Devils seasons is probably going to be the longest and hardest one to do. Especially for the earlier years as there weren't that many fans and even less records of the Devils game-by-game...plus Newjerseydevils.com doesn't have nearly as much info as it should. Haha. Does every season need a game-by-game thing or would a general record with some facts and such be good enough? Prudential Center they may let pass by without it being GA/FA, since it's so new like you said. But, what about Continental Airlines Arena? The only place they've played (until next season begins) as the New Jersey Devils, that wouldn't need to be GA/FA? BsroiaadnTalk 02:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Well New Jersey Devils seasons is pretty much finished... we don't need game-by-game records for THAT article, we just need their record for the season. You're thinking of the individual season articles, which yes, are going to be difficult, but we don't need all of THEM to be GA/FA. All the individual season articles have to do is exist and be created so they can be linked from the NJD seasons article. As far as the building goes, I'd say we don't even need either one for the topic; I was only suggesting them because it would logically fit. At any rate, we'll get there, bit by bit, article by article, edit by edit. Anthony Hit me up... 11:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Yea, I was talking about a game-by-game record for the individual seasons, sorry if I didn't clarify. And so the seasons don't need to be great, just good enough...gotcha. Yea, I guess the buildings wouldn't be required. Too bad we don't have any hockey-related featured topics to go by....but that'll make it just that much better when we make it a featured topic. Haha. How much more do you think should be added to 2003-04 New Jersey Devils season other than the home and road records (if we can find them)? BsroiaadnTalk 23:08, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Anyone up for making one of the seasons FA quality? We could at least try one and see how it works out. Perhaps the most recent season? Or maybe a happier one, like 2003? JHMM13(Disc) 23:28, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
I think it would be a little difficult to bring a season up to FA quality, maybe not impossible...but difficult. I suppose we could make an attempt at it, though I'm not sure what would be said. I think the New Jersey Devils article has enough in it for the seasons that we wouldn't need to bring any season articles up to FA, anyway. If anything I was thinking we could try to get another player up to FA, just to have another FA-article, but I couldn't decide on who. We should get all the seasons articles created and such before we attempt to get any more players up to FA, if we even decide to attempt that. BsroiaadnTalk 00:13, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Have another

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I am proud to award you this barnstar for your contributions to the New Jersey Devils topic, as they have been invaluable to the progress of hockey coverage on Wikipedia. The level of hard work and research you put into these articles is without precedent. JHMM13(Disc) 21:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
By the way, your self-service user box is great X-D. JHMM13(Disc) 22:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, but you really deserve one too. Sorry I couldn't make it sound very good, but I mean it. And about the userbox, thanks. XD BsroiaadnTalk 02:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)


June 2007

insert warning I left him here, It says he was honored, it never mentions it being retired, honored players and retired numbers are in the same section. Look before you edit next time. BsroiaadnTalk 04:44, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

You err in how the section's presented. Bourne's number, which was listed as a retired number is not retired: it's worn by defenseman Chris Campoli.
If you think that pointing out an obvious error is not constructive, that would not be my problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.201.0.51 (talk) 23:05, June 23, 2007
Well, if you had read the section in New York Islanders carefully, it doesn't say it's retired. Here's the exact text you deleted:
"*14 Bob Bourne, LW, 1974-86, inducted in Islander Hall of Fame, November 25, 2006"
Where in there does it say his number is retired? If you look at the other people in that section it states "number retired (at date)". It is not an error at all. He is an honored member, thus listed under the honored members section, which also happens to show some retired numbers...not all of them in that section are retired. BsroiaadnTalk 04:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
The entry is unclear and misleading. If Bourne's number's not retired, then there's no reason to list it. Very simple. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.201.0.51 (talk) 20:15, June 24, 2007
At first glance, I can see how you would think that his number being there means it's retired and how some may be confused by it. But if the person reads the line next to him, which I'm sure they would, they would see that it's not actually retired. BsroiaadnTalk 01:19, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

List of KCS players

Are you in the process of making this article good somewhere in your maze of sub-userpages? If so, let me know. I've started creating individual articles for each of the players (goalies are done), even though they aren't exactly super long. Not exactly sure what is required for length when it comes to FL, but there isn't a requirement, I'm sure we could get this one up pretty easily. Incidentally, I just noticed on your todo page that your sig came from mine...I'm flattered! But I should tell you that the idea for the (disc) came from you. So we each stole from each other... X-D. JHMM13(Disc) 05:42, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Hahaha, actually I've already done the whole list....only about 50 people had ever played on the Kansas City Scouts so that was easy to finish, I think I did it all within a couple hours. I figured I seem to be pretty good at lists, so why not cover some lists of players from the Devils...before they were the Devils? Haha. Next I was gonna do the players for the Colorado Rockies (NHL) but I figure I'll help get the Devils to be a featured topic and then work on it. I really want to get something to FA, though....for some reason I was thinking of trying one of a couple different people. Either Ken Daneyko, Patrik Elias, or John Madden (ice hockey). Don't ask me why, but I do like Madden a lot....but I doubt there is much on him. Daneyko probably has some stuff on him, but probably not that much either, and Elias' references are probably mostly in Czech. Other than Brodeur, it seems not many people are interested in covering Devils players in the news or in books for some reason. I'll try anyway, but I'm not sure which one I'm going to try. And about the sig, haha yea. Good that your flattered, and I feel cool that you got the (disc) idea from me. lol. BsroiaadnTalk 06:05, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Two words: Scott Stevens. Dice or no dice? JHMM13(Disc) 06:15, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
See, I've thought about that many-a-time...and sometimes I'm interested in it, other times I'm not. Patrik Elias I'm always interested in bringing to FA, and I figure it'd be better to do one I'm always interested in doing. Though I'm sure Scott Stevens has many places with information about him and even though I'd rather Patrik, I'd love to bring Scott to FA as well. He was pretty (in)famous...especially for his hits...that's one thing that gained him a lot of notability. Plus, all the Devils fans liked him a lot. BsroiaadnTalk 06:29, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

St Louis Blues

If you think something other than a disambiguation page should go at the title, please initiate discussion first. Thanks, -- Infrogmation 02:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

I was reverting your edits, so I wouldn't be talking if I were you. Secondly, a discussion had already been initiated. Sorry if I'm coming off a little hot-headed, I don't mean to make it seem that way. BsroiaadnTalk 02:52, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, forgot to tell you where the discussion was. It was started at Talk:St. Louis Blues (hockey)#Requested move, don't ask me why it's there instead of St. Louis Blues talk page, but whatever. BsroiaadnTalk 02:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Peoria editor

Saw you mention that you didn't think hockey's minor leagues used A, AA, or AAA designations. I agree with you, but you might want to mention that to the hockey writer for the Peoria JournalStar newspaper, who regularly defines ALL minor pro hockey leagues with a designation like those used in baseball. It must make him feel better, I dunno, but if he does it, I'm going to keep doing it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peoria4440 (talk • contribs) 15:57, June 27, 2007

I think I've seen you (or maybe RGTraynor) mention him before, maybe in an edit summary or on the talk page for International Hockey League (2007-). Who is this guy (as in what's his username)? and why does he insist on placing Baseball-like classes on ice hockey articles? BsroiaadnTalk 16:18, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Brian.

His name is Dave Eminian, and he's covered hockey for the local paper for a long time. The Peoria club was in the IHL from their inception in the early 80's until 1996, when they dropped to the ECHL because of the economics of the IHL at the time. He wasn't happy, of course, because he no longer got to jock-sniff NHL players on a regular basis that would come down from St. Louis.

He lobbied through his columns for years to get Peoria to rejoin "AAA hockey", the "highest level of minor league hockey", and wanted them to join the AHL (which they eventually did two years ago). In the meantime, while Peoria was in the ECHL, there was a geographical rivalry with the Quad City Mallards of the CoHL and UHL. Dave chose to start calling the ECHL the NHL's "AA Developmental league" and the UHL a "Class A" league. It's been going on ever since. In 2006, a new arena opened even closer to Peoria in Bloomington, IL, and put a team in the U-haul. Well, that just ramped up his criticism of the league. He never fails to put "Class A" in his columns in front of any mention of the UHL, CHL and now the new "IHL". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peoria4440 (talk • contribs) 16:26, June 27, 2007

Hmmm...has anyone told him that while he's free to use that in his columns (albeit it, very incorrect) that Wikipedia is a place for factual accuracy and base-ball like classes don't belong in Ice Hockey articles (unless of course the league has A/AA/AAA in it, which some in Canada do, but I think that's mostly Junior leagues)? Also, when you say "put a team in the U-haul", what do you mean? BsroiaadnTalk 17:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, U-hual is a nickname for the UHL.

74.139.139.185 17:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Hahahaha

leave me alone —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mygerardromance (talk • contribs) 20:13, June 27, 2007

lol, a vandal asking to be left alone. BsroiaadnTalk 20:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM???

Just leave me alone already. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mygerardromance (talk • contribs) 20:15, June 27, 2007

I did, I've reverted your vandalism, warned you, and haven't talked to you since.... BsroiaadnTalk 20:21, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

2000 NHL Entry Draft

You can prosecute the diacritics war if you want, but you also reverted a ton of league and team name fixes as well. I've re-reverted the page, and if you want to go remove diacritics, you do that, but don't destroy all of my other edits as well. Elrith 08:01, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I realize I reverted the league names, too. I attempted to fix it but 90% of the articles I went to at that point were lagging, if they were loading at all. While I was waiting for the changes I may (putting the league names back to how you had them), I realized there was no clear consensus on whether diacritics should be on articles like that or not. Player pages yes, team pages no, but other articles have never been mentioned. So I was trying to go back and change it back, but couldn't. If you'd like to participate, there's a discussion going on at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Archive78#Diacritics on non-team and non-player pages about it right now. BsroiaadnTalk 09:52, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Stat table

I was going to post this at WP:HOCKEY but it's lagging for me so I'll post it here so at least you can see it. I put the darker shade in some stats in my sandbox to show what they might look like. The first one is the current shade with cellpadding set to 1, second is darker shade with cellpadding set to 1, and the third one is darker shade with cellpadding set to 0. You've probably already seen how it looks for yourself, but I wanted to show you just incase. BsroiaadnTalk 18:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Yeah I think that works. We could definitely do that.--Djsasso 22:32, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Alright, cool. Would cellpadding=0 be ok if we used that darker shading as well or should cellpadding=1 be used anyway? BsroiaadnTalk 23:08, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
0 would be find with the darker shade cause the darker shade is better at keeping your eye following along. --Djsasso 01:19, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Letter classes

There was NOTHING not factual about my recent edits to the ECHL. NOTHING. How is it that the "AA" distinction is allowed on that page, but no other hockey league is allowed to designate a level? I thought we just had this discussion. Peoria4440 19:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, we did, and you agreed that letter rankings shouldn't be used and that it was just some editor that was pushing it...and that was just two days ago. Plus, you and RGTraynor are having an ongoing discussion about it, right? You should really wait until you two agree on something before you keep adding things like that. BsroiaadnTalk 19:24, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
To avoid confusion, I was NOT the one who added the "AA" thing to the ECHL. Check the status after you reverted the page to his last edit. I'm saying my last edit was 100% factual, no opinions were given. I didn't even take out the "AA" designation that RG added to it. I'm just frustrated with what I see to be double standards where the minor league hockey pages are concerned, that's all. Peoria4440 19:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
I see what you mean. Sorry, I guess I mis-read it. I have since reverted my own revert. BsroiaadnTalk 20:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia: WikiProject Ice Hockey

On Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey#Wikiproject notice you added NHL (it was to "all player pages" not team, but that made me think of it), but is it just NHL or is it all North American team pages? I thought it included the AHL, ECHL, etc. too. Or am I wrong? I just wanna make sure before I keep going. BsroiaadnTalk 19:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

My additon of NHL was something I forgot to add over a week ago (concerning NHL player pages only). It has nothing to do with the current discussion. Those policies can be amended, when there's an agreement on all hockey related pages. GoodDay 19:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
I understand that it has nothing to do with the current discussion, but I was just confused since I thought the AHL and other North American league team pages shouldn't have diacritics. So every league other than the NHL should have them? I'm asking you instead of bringing it up at WP:HOCKEY since there's already enough arguing there right now, unfortunately. Plus, even if it was calm, it's pretty apparent that it would just start another heated discussion. BsroiaadnTalk 19:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
The diacritics usage agreement (currently in effect) is for NHL team pages and NHL player pages only. If my plan for the 'current discussion' is accepted, it would effect 'all' hockey related articles (Non-NHL leagues, teams, players included). Your confusion was caused by my 'failure' to add NHL to the NHL player pages policy. I apologies for any inconvenience. GoodDay 20:00, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Currently, diacritics are banned only from the NHL team pages. GoodDay 20:25, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Alright, I understand. Thanks. Sorry I didn't respond sooner, I was reading something and decided to wait till I was done to reply. Thanks, though. BsroiaadnTalk 20:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

= farty pants =

What the fuck are you fucking about and wikipedie should allow personal attacks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.137.195.118 (talk) 22:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

UR A POO

The killers rock, fool!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.160.120.246 (talk) 4:32, June 30, 2007

Current news

Is this something that was reached at WP:HOCKEY? I remember being told that all of them should be hidden till the season starts or at least till we're close to the season starting (excluding draft and the such). Or is this something that you see as being part of the season where as some of the other editors don't agree. I really don't care that much either way, only reason I hid it was because most of the other teams have it hidden as well. Bringing this up at WP:HOCKEY probably isn't a good idea right now, anyway...still some stuff that needs to be settled that it seems hasn't been, or it's at least not clear. Also, do you mind if I make some edits at List of Calgary Flames players? I know you're currently working on it and some editors extrememly dis-like when people come in and do something to a work-in-progress, so I figured I'd ask first. I'll try to do it at times where an edit conflict will definitely not occur, if that's alright with you. BsroiaadnTalk 05:58, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

If there has been a discussion about showing/hiding the current season tag, I haven't seen it. I simply went with what was logical to me, especially since I presume there will be people who will be looking into the main team articles wondering who was drafted, and who was signed, and that is the logical jumping off place. If there was a discussion that I overlooked, or if you disagree with my reasoning, feel free to revert back.
And yes, feel free to edit the List of Calgary Flames players. I always welcome improvements to anything I am working on, especially right now, as I have two real life crises ongoing that are starting to severely restrict my editing time. Resolute 06:02, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
If there was a discussion, I haven't seen it either...I just assumed when I was told and when people went through hiding them that there was one and I was too busy to check at the time. And nah, I'll leave it, that reason does make a lot of sense. Alright, thanks. I know how that is, man. I hope everything works out and goes well, or as well as it can go. BsroiaadnTalk 06:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Devils 1982 1983 team photo.jpg

I put back in the deletion and the orphaning messages for Image:Devils 1982 1983 team photo.jpg. Please note {{ifd}} should not be deleted while discussed. If you disagree with the nomination, please post your concerns on the deletion list. Since the image is still an orphan also the other message should remain on the description page. Thanks, Ilse@ 08:32, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I must have mis-read it. It was late and I was tired, so yea. Sorry. BsroiaadnTalk 20:20, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bsroiaadn/Archive_3&oldid=1190107975"