User talk:Btr ships

November 2012

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at Elisabeth Gold, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:14, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Alexf^(talk) 15:24, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Btr ships (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My edit was in fact relevant and truthful. I was providing useful information to users who wish to research Logan Henderson. Also, the Wikipedia saying is "The free encyclopedia that ANYONE can edit." My useful information was deleted for no reason.

Decline reason:

This does not appear to be an honest depiction of your edits. Kuru (talk) 02:20, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Btr ships (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is in fact a true depiction of my edit, If you knew anything about Logan Henderson or Big Time Rush then you would know that Logan Mitchell was in fact named Hortense but his mother did not approve of the name so she renamed him Logan. Big Time Rush is frequently on Figure It Out because they are Nickelodeon stares and it is a Nickelodeon show. Also, by blocking me from editing, you are violating my First Amendment right to free speech. I would thank you if you wouldn't lie by saying anyone can edit your site. BTR Ships (talk) 02:46, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've made absolutely clear that you're not to edit constructively. Your temporary block is now indefinite. Elockid ^(Talk) 03:19, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Btr ships (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You've made absolutely clear that you violate peoples rights and lie to everyone when you tell them they can edit pages. It is strange how you say that wikipedia is all the truth but no teachers or professors will allow their students to use it. Funny huh? Do your research, my information was true. And the idiots who block this should get the facts straight before they block someone. Just because you are an idiot who doesn't know anything about Logan Henderson, doesn't mean you can leave out TRUE informention about his character. By the way, it's in the Constitution, the First Amendment, that I have a right to free speech. I could sue. BTR Ships (talk) 03:40, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The First Amendment doesn't apply here, and a legal threat is never a good idea. As for the substance of this unblock request... well, there is none. Kinu ^t/_c 04:36, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user (block log | active blocks | autoblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs | abuse log) has had their talk page access revoked because an administrator has identified this user's talkpage edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. If you would like to make further requests, you may contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Kinu ^t/_c 04:41, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]