User talk:BukitBintang8888

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Hello, BukitBintang8888, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 23:37, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest[edit]

It is obvious you have a conflict of interest re Calvin Cheng. You may be aligned to the political opposition in Singapore. From now on, please do not directly edit the page. Discuss on the talk page and leave editing to the independent editors not living in Singapore who have done a lot of work to make the article NPOV Historicalchild (talk) 17:43, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

I have no COI. Go ahead and complain if you think I have one.--BukitBintang8888 (talk) 04:01, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
You have been disruptively editing. WP:STONEWALLING and edit warring [1]. You are misrepresenting others' edits and claiming to act on behalf of other editors, even when the editors themselves do not seem to be opposing my edits. I am convinced that you are a sock of Aricialam (who was blocked by Drmies for threatening offline harassment and socking). I would urge you to refrain from further disruptive editing.--BukitBintang8888 (talk) 04:41, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017[edit]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Calvin Cheng.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OppieSG (talk) 14:08, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

OppieSG and where is the disruptive edit? Diffs please.--BukitBintang8888 (talk) 14:11, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Jane Dawson and Anachronist made significant changes to the article in the last few days. By adding back the material without discussion with them, it is as good as reverting and edit warring. Thanks OppieSG (talk) 14:13, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
You talk exactly like Aricialam, RobotRat and Historicalchild and a host of other IPs. Misrepresenting stuff, trying to threaten users. I won't be surprised if you are another sockpuppet of Aricialam youself, now trying to get the article deleted because it is not according to your satisfaction. Basically if you cannot add puffery, better delete it.--BukitBintang8888 (talk) 14:21, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Oh and if I am edit warring, you may ask the opinion of another admin such as Drmies.--BukitBintang8888 (talk) 14:21, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
I wasn’t threatening. And I didn’t ever revert your changes. I am just saying that you reverted all the changes that Jane Dawson and Anachronist made. And I am not a sockpuppet of anyone. Do not like the accusations when I am discussing this in good faith OppieSG (talk) 14:31, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
I didn't revert all the changes. Stop misrepresenting again, like how the socks keep doing. And stop trying to present yourself as innocent (like how the socks were doing). Jane Dawson added the entire quite which I disagreed with. Anachronist removed the part about Amos Yee and removed content from the price fixing and I disagreed with. I explained both on the talk.--BukitBintang8888 (talk) 14:34, 13 December 2017 (UTC)