User talk:CQ/Context of community

Clergy and Laity

What is the fundamental relationship between the scholar and the lay person? • CQ 22:16, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of this article was to touch anthropology, sociology, psychology, philosophy, etc. and show how all of these fields have dealt with the context of community. A less academic and more human treatment of the topic might make it more appealing. CQ 14:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Problems

In the context of Community, reason must triumph over confusion.

{{dated prod|concern = {{{concern|dicdef at best, hoax at worst}}}|month = July|day = 29|year = 2006|time = 22:21|timestamp = 20060729222155}}

This article will be expanded in due time. Patience is a virtue. CQ 02:37, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If it's currently unsuitable for an article, but you believe it will be, then you can move it to you own userspace (User:CQ/Context of community.) I don't think it's accepted practice to remove a deletion notice without discussion. --Singkong2005 ^talk 12:20, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why do people just critisize and delete things? Why would anyone think this article is a hoax? Why didn't anyone answer my question? That bad community. CQ 13:49, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Head, heart and soul

I've completed a draft of the opening statement and added a crude outline. My friends will be here shortly. CQ 03:19, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]