User talk:CacheOverride
Welcome!
[edit]Hi CacheOverride! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! --Kmhkmh (talk) 15:11, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit]
Hello, CacheOverride. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. BrigadierG (talk) 12:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
== Deletion discussion about Asuna Gilfoyle ==
Hello CacheOverride, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Asuna Gilfoyle, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asuna Gilfoyle.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|JSFarman}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
Rather than nominate it for deletion, I requested that the article be deleted as there is no Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance.
JSFarman (talk) 15:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Asuna Gilfoyle deleted
[edit]Rather than nominate it for deletion, I requested that the article be deleted as there was no credible claim of his significance. JSFarman (talk) 15:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of A.P. Gilfoyle & Co., L.P. for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.P. Gilfoyle & Co., L.P. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.