User talk:Caciss

Discussion Please feel free to write responses to my edits here, whether compliments or criticism; these responses do not have to be constructive -- like what I say here will prevent or limit your responses anyway.

2006_Serie_A_scandal

What parts do you think are confusing? I'll try to make them less confusing. --Awiseman 15:33, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Honk Honk

Honk. Valkysas 04:23, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: copyright status of Image:Neilfanning.jpg

Where in yahoo.com does this picture come from? Pls provide more detail re: the "source" and pls confirm the copyright status. It may be a copyright violation if it was copied without a licence from another website such as yahoo.com. --74.14.18.181 13:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Neilfanning.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Neilfanning.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\^talk 23:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Achewood.gif}

Thank you for uploading Image:Achewood.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:40, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Macombcommunitycollegepdc.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Macombcommunitycollegepdc.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:40, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Siredwardhenry.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Siredwardhenry.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:08, 8 December 2013 (UTC)