User talk:CainTB

Welcome!

Hi CainTB! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 16:38, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to draft

I moved your new creation to Draft:Hogan Assessments Systems as it was in the wrong namespace and needs more work prior to being placed as an article.--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 16:39, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hogan Assessments Systems moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hogan Assessments Systems, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 22:25, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hogan Assessments Systems

Hello, CainTB. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hogan Assessments Systems".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Complete bibliography

Hello, CainTB. I have reverted your addition of the complete bibliography at Robert Hogan (psychologist). For one thing, the additions are all unsourced, and I wonder where you got this huge list. More serious, to me, though, is the sheer weight of it. Even reliably sourced, what would we need the entire bibliography for? Where's the value? Are they all equally important works? (I would be amazed.) What are the seminal or defining works? What made the biggest splash among his peers?

I think the addition of almost 30KB (a 140% increase, if my math is right) is way too much. Perhaps you can make a prudent selection of his works and add that, with a source. (Also, regarding formatting: don't add line-breaks in the middle of the entry. It should all be one single line, even if it's so long that it automatically wraps. And books and journals get italicized, article names get double "quotation" marks.) — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 22:57, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]