User talk:CanadianAME

Welcome[edit]

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-en.ogv

A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, CanadianAME, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 00:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015[edit]

Your recent editing history at Aircraft maintenance engineer (Canada) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Ahunt (talk) 13:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Historical origins of the AME[edit]

Hi, I have rescued some of your material deleted from Aircraft maintenance engineer (Canada) and am reworking it here. If you have any comments to make, I would be glad for you to join the discussion. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 14:55, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AME discussion[edit]

Hi, I moved the historical material to the Aircraft maintenance engineer article. There is now a discussion at Talk:Aircraft maintenance engineer which you might like to contribute to. Also, the sources I have been finding suggest that the threat to the AME or LAME is/was worldwide and not just restricted to Canada. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 15:34, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Convention portant reglementation de la Navigation adrienne - Paris 13 October1919.pdf[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Convention portant reglementation de la Navigation adrienne - Paris 13 October1919.pdf

This work created by the United Kingdom Government is in the public domain.

This is because it is one of the following:

It is a photograph taken prior to 1 June 1957; or
It was published prior to 1974; or
It is an artistic work other than a photograph or engraving (e.g. a painting) which was created prior to 1974.

HMSO has declared that the expiry of Crown Copyrights applies worldwide (ref: HMSO Email Reply)
More information.

See also Copyright and Crown copyright artistic works.

You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CanadianAME (talk) 17:43, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016[edit]

Your recent editing history at Aircraft Maintenance Engineer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Ahunt (talk) 00:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conduct warning[edit]

WARNING. The accusations and threats which you made in this comment are wholly unacceptable. If you continue to pursue such gross violations of WP:CIVIL and related policies, you may be reported and sanctions may be taken against your ability to engage on Wikipeda. Note that this is your second conduct warning. There may not be another. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 10:22, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Duties of the Licensed Ground Engineer.pdf[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Duties of the Licensed Ground Engineer.pdf

This work created by the United Kingdom Government is in the public domain.

This is because it is one of the following:

It is a photograph taken prior to 1 June 1957; or
It was published prior to 1974; or
It is an artistic work other than a photograph or engraving (e.g. a painting) which was created prior to 1974.

HMSO has declared that the expiry of Crown Copyrights applies worldwide (ref: HMSO Email Reply)
More information.

See also Copyright and Crown copyright artistic works.

:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CanadianAME (talk) 17:45, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A.I.R Engineer[edit]

Hello, CanadianAME. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, A.I.R Engineer, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:11, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of nomination for deletion of A.I.R Engineer[edit]

This is to inform you that this article has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.I.R Engineer. - Ahunt (talk) 20:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed new home for A.I.R Engineer[edit]

Hi, I don't think your article can stay where it is. Can I suggest that you move it to whichever you consider to be the more usual of User:CanadianAME/AIR Engineer or User:CanadianAME/A.I.R. Engineer. It can then remain in your "user space" until it can be made publishable. Done quickly, this should with luck bypass the deletion proposal. If you are unsure about how to move it, let me know and I can do that for you. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 11:01, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have moved it. I also moved the other draft over and added code to your main user page to list them - and any others that might get created. I hope that is OK. If not, get back to me or whatever. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 18:40, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will come and help tidy as and when I can, but as I say, I am very busy elsewhere for quite some time so I will not be able to do much. If you hit any Wikipedia-related issues, do drop me a line. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 08:43, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]