User talk:Caribbean Jerk Chicken

August 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Balzac, Alberta have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Balzac, Alberta was changed by Caribbean Jerk Chicken (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873899 on 2022-08-26T23:33:45+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:33, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at CrossIron Mills. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:34, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jerk (cooking), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Jerk (cooking) was changed by Caribbean Jerk Chicken (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884695 on 2022-08-26T23:34:22+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:34, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at CrossIron Mills. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:34, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below this notice. Materialscientist (talk) 23:35, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request #1

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Caribbean Jerk Chicken (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

Please describe how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you'd make. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.