User talk:Casaitalianadellusso

Ways to improve Jacob abrian

Hi, I'm St170e. Casaitalianadellusso, thanks for creating Jacob abrian!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Superb article!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. st170e^talk 23:27, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 00:01, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Casaitalianadellusso (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

tirobikki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

when I registered the account it wasn't mentioned the policies for selected a name, and after I read the notice I tried to change it as I understood that by unintentionally my previously selected name might be violating the policies, hope you understand, I am a new user

Decline reason:

I might well have unblocked this account, had you not decided to use multiple accounts to try to fix the deletion discussion on your spam article, by giving the misleading impression of widespread independent support. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:23, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Casaitalianadellusso (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock my account, I recognise that it was a mistake to choose a username that doesn't show one person, I haven't seen previously the policies as I was new to the wikipedia, in case you decline my request, then please delete this account as I don't see any reason to stay here, thanks tirobikki 13:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I've run a checkuser and Confirmed that you have created multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 16:34, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It wasn't just the username--you also created seven accounts to defend in the deletion discussion. By the way, accounts on Wikipedia cannot be deleted. Origamite^ⓣⓒ 15:09, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jacob Abrian

The article Jacob Abrian has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Puff piece written by one of his managers Casa Italiana Del Lusso. Borderline notable, article must be rewritten.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf^(talk) 00:06, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jacob Abrian for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jacob Abrian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Abrian until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexf^(talk) 00:19, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]