User talk:Cestlavieleir

April 2019

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- Mr X 🖋 12:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Meh

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Ok

Don't use false edit summaries as you did here (it's obviously sourced) Don't mess with other people's comments as you did here.

Speaking of which, how in hell, does an account created so recently know how to hat discussions? Right.Volunteer Marek (talk) 23:17, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit said there was insufficient evidence that Donald Trump colluded with Russia. But the source you cited didn't say there was any evidence so you made up the insufficient part. If you mean the Lally section I removed I explained why on the talk page in the section Lally where we discussed it a few weeks ago. I'm surprised you don't remember.

So my edit summary was fine and now I have a request, don't fabricate content especially about living people.

Yeah I'll hat discussions that don't belong on article talk pages. If you don't take jabs at editors that have nothing to do with the article it shouldn't be a problem. Cestlavieleir (talk) 15:15, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is this your first account?

Your edit summaries which demonstrate knowledge of Wikipedia policy and procedures + the fact that you are reverting edits on pages you've never been on before within 90 minutes[1][2] (as if you were watchlisting the pages on a separate account) raise some questions. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 21:16, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert, please read

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 15:02, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message, please read:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 09:13, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]