User talk:Chace Watson

June 2009

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Corbin Bleu. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Earlypsychosis (talk) 09:31, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to User:Earlypsychosis has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see this page for instructions. Thank you. Wikieditor06 (talk) 17:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding these moves, I'm rather curious why they were made. The end titles are userpages for users who don't exist, so I've taken the liberty of moving both back, but I would still like to hear why you made the moves in the first place. Cheers. lifebaka++ 22:10, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Corbin Bleu, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Tags are there for a reason; please don't remove them without very good reason. Rodhull andemu 20:28, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

I've moved your user page here because it falls foul of this guideline (#7), and since your userpage was not excluded from indexing by Google, it could be mistaken for a real Wikipedia article. Please ask on my Talk page if you have any questions. Thanks. Rodhull andemu 23:48, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Corbin Bleu, you will be blocked from editing. Rodhull andemu 05:59, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Corbin Bleu. arunkumar^{checkmate me} 06:06, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Corbin Bleu article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. SWAdair | Talk 10:22, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox for Corbin Bleu

Please stop adding plain text and the filmography to his navigation box, they don't belong there. BOVINEBOY 2008 :) 14:25, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tokio Hotel

Your last edit of Tokio Hotel removed an image and replaced it with a dead link to a non-existing image, so I reverted that edit. I don't understand what you intented to do, but what you did was useless and disrupting. BNutzer (talk) 23:01, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Your addition to Corbin Bleu has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. —Kww(talk) 17:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

fan sites

I've removed that fan-site from the infobox of Corbin Bleu several times now. The infobox is not a place for fan-sites. Any link in the infobox has to be to an official site maintained by the artist. Do not restore that link again.—Kww(talk) 17:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Final Warning

Your addition to Corbin Bleu has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You must stop inserting copyright violations into that article. You have been warned repeatedly about your editing. It must stop.—Kww(talk) 17:26, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 55 hours for persistent addition of blatant copyright violations and failure to observe editing guidelines. Please take the time to review our policies and those guidelines.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu 17:42, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 123 hours for Straight off your last block, you reinsert the copyrighted material that got you blocked before. Verbatim. You next block is very likely to be your last, and that's without the sockpuppetry, for which you were very lucky not to have your last block extended.. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Rodhull andemu 00:29, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued sockpuppetry. I warned you, but you chose not to listen.. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu 16:58, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]