The reason i reverted you edit was due to the fact that you removed content from an article without giving a good reason in the Edit summary, you may have explained your self on the talk page, but that is not visible on the main article itself. It is no big deal, and many users forget to use the Edit summary. Thank you, and happy editing. Tiptoety 23:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- You are welcome. Tiptoety 04:52, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
I almost never go back to a past argument... I long ago discovered that wikipedia is run by idiots. So I'll just make a small case in the discussions and leave the rest up to "the people". However, I recently "found" my disscussion there so I'm making a response.
The problem was the sources listed did not cite what he stated.
And with your statment that INTP Communites agree, the problem is most people rely on wikipedia too much. They read from it, and believe it to be the truth. There are even sites that copy wikipedias articles and use them as their own (Abridged, of course). The fact is, without credible sources, any point made is moot.
The person in question said that because he was an INTP he was a valid source, I countered his argument by stating that because I was also an INTP and did not agree with his assessment, that he was wrong.