User talk:Charles08-09-41

August 2023

Hello, I'm 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:21, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That was indeed a mistake. It shouldn’t have happened. Charles08-09-41 (talk) 02:24, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:22, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have vanished nothing Charles08-09-41 (talk) 02:23, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

vandalised* auto correct.

Charles08-09-41 (talk) 02:24, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Prince George of Denmark. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:33, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is all a mistake. English is not my fist language. Please give me another chance. Charles08-09-41 (talk) 02:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:39, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have been told wrong words and the meaning of those words by others. I did not know the correct words when typing them out. I didn’t do what I did on purpose to cause problems.

I would really like this block to go away because I really didn’t mean to do anything wrong.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Charles08-09-41 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here Charles08-09-41 (talk) 03:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nothing but vandalism from this account. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:13, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Charles08-09-41 (talk) 03:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]