User talk:Chebo

New Animorphs

I have removed the reference to New Animorphs from the Animorphs (TV series) page. You did not cite any sources for it, hence my removal of the information. I did not try to get the New Animorphs article deleted, however. If you can cite a source for the existence of this New Animorphs series I won't request it to be deleted. Soulsteelgray 01:45, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dino Thunder miscellany

I went through an edit war with another user concerning the use of the Dino Rangers' Dinosaur names instead of the Dino names earlier. What is officially used by the series? Are they the Red Tyranno, Yellow Ptera, Blue Tricera, Black Brachio, and White Drago Rangers or are they the Red, Yellow, Blue, Black, and White Dino Rangers? Ryūlóng 09:27, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My question is more towards a question on what their titles are. Is Kira, for example, the Yellow Ptera Ranger or the Yellow Dino Ranger? Ryūlóng 09:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And for clarification:

Conner: Red Tyranno Ranger or Red Dino Ranger?
Ethan: Blue Tricera Ranger or Blue Dino Ranger?
Tommy: Black Brachio Ranger or Black Dino Ranger?
Trent: White Drago Ranger or White Dino Ranger?

--Ryūlóng 09:46, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:PRMF Red Koragg.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:PRMF Red Koragg.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ Bigr Tex 18:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Dragonball-evolution2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dragonball-evolution2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:24, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dragonball Evolution

Hey, sorry I had to revert your plot summary. The summary you wrote was nearly 1800 words long! That is just way way too long for Wikipedia and can be considered a copyright violation. As I noted on the article talk page, the plot should only cover the main points, not the minute scene-by-scene details. If you have a copy of MS Word, you might want to try working on rewriting it there, checking the word count as you go. At max, it should be 700 words, and preferably closer to 400-500 with its length. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 09:15, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it does need to cover the entire plot, start to finish, not just a bit of the start of the film with a teaser ending. If you are having trouble with it, today (after I've slept), I'll pare down your original to the appropriate size. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 10:52, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great job!! Third times the charm, they say, and that one will work just fine! Thanks :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Captain Pollution in his first appearance.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Captain Pollution in his first appearance.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:20, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]