User talk:Cheery cheerleeding captain

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cheerleading, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 21:25, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:37, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 21:48, 11 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cheery cheerleeding captain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason hereplease give us a 2nd chance. i didnt do anything i actualy dont even no who was sooo mean hear it wasnt me. -mandy (cheery_cheerleading_captain) <3

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Sandstein 22:04, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|1=I understand what you have been blocked for (being mean with other name, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead.}}

To whomever reviews this unblock request: Note that User:LBHS Cheerleader has socked incessantly the past year or so (around 20 socks and perhaps more). This lone edit says it all. –MuZemike 01:36, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm familiar with this particular brand of idiocy; "she" has "her" own entry on the LTA page. Kids (I have ample reason to believe that more than one person is involved), you're out of here and your talk page privileges are revoked. Find someplace else to play and stop wasting both your time and ours. PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:55, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would someone care to run a checkuser on this particular account? I have my suspicions that they may not be the vandal they are impersonating, and regardless, there are probably more socks left in the box. Please let me know if anyone does this (and what turns up). Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 04:57, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]