User talk:Chimichalupa

A tag has been placed on Informatist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Cunard (talk) 23:13, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Informatist article could be rewritten (if better sources can be found)

Hello Chimichalupa. I looked at the deleted version of Informatist, and I have to agree with the admin who deleted it. It is slightly improved from the version deleted at AfD in July, but only just. Some of your references appear to be press releases. If the game is in widespread use, you would expect that it might be reviewed somewhere in the trade press. The references did not include anything that appeared to be an actual review by someone who had used the game. If you can find any improved references, send them to me. The article would also have to be rewritten to be less promotional. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 17:17, 6 September 2008 (UTC)