User talk:ChristopheS

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Proposed deletion of EGovMoNet[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article EGovMoNet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Ephemeral project. No independent sources about the project. Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 13:23, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

See Talk:EGovMoNet for objections to the proposed deletion. ChristopheS (talk) 23:55, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Err, yes, I did delete the article after it was restored. The reason that happened is because the {{PROD}} was left on it, and it showed up as an expired PROD. As you are intent on working on the article, I will userfy it for you at User:ChristopheS/EGovMoNet (without the PROD tag). Mjroots (talk) 10:13, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
OK, I've restored the article and its talk page, and moved both to a subpage of your user page, without redirects. Please feel free to work on the article and improve it. It can be moved back when ready. Mjroots (talk) 10:18, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks!! ChristopheS (talk) 11:19, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

WP:OUP access[edit]

Hello, WP:The Wikipedia Library has record of you being approved for access to Oxford University Press's humanities materials through the TWL partnership described at WP:OUP . You should have recieved a Wikipedia email from User:Nikkimaria several weeks ago with instructions for access, including a link to a form collecting information relevant to that access. Please find that email, and follow those instructions. If you were not approved, did not recieve the email, or are having some other concern or question, please respond to this message at Wikipedia talk:OUP/Approved. Thanks much, Sadads (talk) 22:06, 5 August 2014 (UTC) Note: You are recieving this message from an semi-automatically generated list. If you think you were incorrectly contacted, make sure to note that at Wikipedia talk:OUP/Approved.

OK, I have filled out the form. --ChristopheS (talk) 20:51, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:ChristopheS/EGovMoNet[edit]

Hello ChristopheS. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "EGovMoNet".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:ChristopheS/EGovMoNet}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Randykitty (talk) 14:12, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

West Australian Opera[edit]

In October 2014, the West Australian Opera announced that it would not stage the opera for the next two years because Carmen works in a cigarette factory and the opera company had signed a deal with Healthway, a government organisation that promotes health in Western Australia.[1][2]

  1. ^ Wynne, Emma: "WA Opera butts out Carmen over smoking themes after securing Healthway sponsorship", ABC News, 8 October 2014.
  2. ^ Tran, Mark: "Australian opera company drops Carmen over smoking scenes ", The Guardian, Thursday 9 October 2014.

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)