User talk:Creativaindia

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Employeeperformance (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome!

Hello, Creativaindia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Employee performance, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fæ (talk) 05:48, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Employee Performance

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Employee Performance. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Performance management. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Performance management - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Top Jim (talk) 12:52, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Employee Performance, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Top Jim (talk) 13:04, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Employee Performance. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Top Jim (talk) 13:05, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Employee Performance. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Top Jim (talk) 13:14, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Performance management, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Top Jim (talk) 13:15, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:30, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 13:32, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Creativaindia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a new user. I have read the terms of wiki now and would follow them. please unblock me

Decline reason:

Only one request at a time, please. Sandstein 15:08, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was blocked because i removed speedy delete from my own post. I was not aware that it is not allowed. Please unblock me. I wont repeat this mistake. Thanks. Waiting for help. Creativaindia (talk) 14:13, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was blocked because i removed speedy delete from my own post. I was not aware that it is not allowed. Please unblock me. I wont repeat this mistake. Thanks. Waiting for help.

{{helpme}} I was blocked because i removed speedy delete from my own post. I was not aware that it is not allowed. Please unblock me. I wont repeat this mistake. Thanks. Waiting for help.

{{adminhelp}} Creativaindia (talk) 14:07, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Creativaindia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not aware of the terms as I am new to Wikipedia. I have read up all the terms and would follow them now. Please unblock me. Thanks

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Sandstein 15:08, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Creativaindia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello I was blocked because I removed the speedy delete from my own page. I was not aware that this is not allowed. However, I have understood this now and would not repeat it again. I want to make useful contributions to Wikipedia so please allow me to do so by unblocking me. I would be really grateful. Thanks.

Decline reason:

That's just a small part of the block; it was for spamming/advertising, which you didn't address at all in your request. Please don't be disingenuous, especially when you're already under investigation for sockpuppetry. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:55, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Creativaindia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I am new to Wikipedia and made the following mistakes: a) I removed the speedy edit from my page 4 times. b) I tried to replace the "Performance Management" page with my own page. I was not aware of the wikipedia functions and terms and so this happened. I apologise for my mistakes and have read all the terms now. No such thing would be repeated. I want to make valuable contributions to Wikipedia now. Please unblock me. I would be highly grateful. Thanks.

Decline reason:

See below. There is no useful purpose in having two open unblock requests at once. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have reordered your requests so that new messages appear at the bottom of the page. Please add all new text at the bottom. Your unblock request still does not address the reasons for your block. Sandstein 16:33, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Creativaindia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I read all the threads, I got to know I have been blocked for the following reasons: a. Removing the speedy delete from my own page. b. Trying to edit the "Performance Management" page and replace it. c. Advertising/Spamming I would however, like to assure that all this happened because I'm a new user to Wikipedia and no such thing was intended. Please get me unblocked. I want to make some valuable additions to Wikipedia. I really apologise for all the errors on my part.

Decline reason:

You are, frankly, being disingenuous, as another administrator has already said. Your claims that you innocently did not realise that there was anything wrong with what you were doing, and now realise your mistake, do not fit well with the fact that you were given a whole string of warnings, which you simply ignored until you were blocked. You were well aware of the objections to your editing. I strongly suggest that you think carefully before making any more unblock requests. If you waste administrators' time with yet more unblock requests based on such dubious claims, you may well have talk page access removed. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Creativaindia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Admin. I made the following mistakes: a. Removing the speedy delete from my own page. b. Trying to edit the "Performance Management" page and replace it. c. Advertising/Spamming I would however, like to assure that all this happened because I'm a new user to Wikipedia and no such thing was intended. Please get me unblocked. I want to make some valuable additions to Wikipedia. I really apologise for all the errors on my part. It has been said that my claims are false and I am trying to act disingenuous. But this is not the case because I didnt know the way to work around with Wikipedia. I didnt even know how to read the warnings. I have learnt all this now only. I really request you to consider my case. I didn't know the functionality of the talk page - and I am being completely honest about it. Thanks

Decline reason:

No response in 48hrs. A future unblock request may be made as long as it addresses the issues noted below - see WP:GAB (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:48, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I really feel troubled. I await a response from some admin. I am ready to explain, but I really didn't know about those warnings. No that I do, No such thing would be repeated for sure!

If you're troubled, it's because you failed to read policies that you actually agreed to when you signed up.

What is your relationship to User:Employeeperformance?
Have you read WP:PROMO and WP:NOTDIRECTORY?
Do you understand what conflict of interest is?
Have you read and fully understood the 5 pillars of Wikipedia (there may be a quiz later)

This is just a start ... any comments? Please do not request unblock, just respond below ... this page is being monitored now (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:18, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]