User talk:Cric Edits
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you created the page for a Good Article review of Virat Kohli. Reviewing good articles can be extremely difficult, even for experienced users, and the article in question failed a good article nomination only last year. I suggest gaining more experience before attempting to do good article reviews. You can visit the Task Center if you would like to help out, or the Teahouse if you have any questions. Thanks! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks !! . Its my new account on Wikipedia as I lost my old account due to some technicalities. I had been editing cricket articles on Wikipedia for a long time now ,so I have some built-up experience in doing these reviews . Cric Edits (talk) 15:28, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- What was the username of your previous account? — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:29, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- Sir Dee03 Cric Edits (talk) 15:34, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- There is no user with that username on Wikipedia. Could you provide a link to the other account's contributions? — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:36, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- User ID is 16,844,218 . Its "Dee03" Cric Edits (talk) 15:41, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- That user does not appear to be you—their writing style is completely different. If that is you, why would you review an article for Good Article status if you have nominated it yourself in the past? Can you provide any proof that you are Dee03? — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- Their's no way i guess I could prove it to you , as of now . Anyways, is it necessary to have such an in-depth investigation ? . I initiated to review because it was a GA nominee , did by some other user . That does conflict with my nomination that I did at that time . I am nowhere near related to its nomination so kindly permit me to review it . Cric Edits (talk) 16:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- That user does not appear to be you—their writing style is completely different. If that is you, why would you review an article for Good Article status if you have nominated it yourself in the past? Can you provide any proof that you are Dee03? — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- User ID is 16,844,218 . Its "Dee03" Cric Edits (talk) 15:41, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- There is no user with that username on Wikipedia. Could you provide a link to the other account's contributions? — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:36, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- Sir Dee03 Cric Edits (talk) 15:34, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- What was the username of your previous account? — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:29, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Cric Edits! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
[edit]| Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
March 2024 GAN backlog drive
[edit]| Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |