User talk:CripKiller1

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Roger Williams (theologian) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Martin451 (talk) 22:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CripKiller1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

A friend used my computer and messed around while i was away. i need it for use in a computer class i am taking at my local college. please unblock i will make sure that this problem does not arise again.

Decline reason:

This account has been used solely for vandalism. You can still read Wikipedia for your class just fine. Kuru ^talk 02:15, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CripKiller1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. My son got on my account while i was away from the computer and he has subsequently caused a block due to his immature behavior and i would just like to be unblocked please.

Decline reason:

We hear that quite often. Your first edit was vandalism so I am afraid unblocking is not an option. — Sandahl (talk) 03:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

CripKiller1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

71.120.231.143 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Vandalism-only account

Blocking administrator: PeterSymonds (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 04:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Per second chance. Good luck. :) PeterSymonds (talk) 15:04, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request handled by: PeterSymonds (talk) 15:04, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that this guy deserves a second chance because he finally seems to be admitting that he did it. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 04:29, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I figure it costs us little to offer someone a second chance and he seems to finally be repentent. – Luna Santin (talk) 04:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Luna, but am awaiting the blocking admins response. I agree that blocking again will be pretty easy and but I'm sure we can trust this account. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:25, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked and autoblock removed per second chance. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 14:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]